1
$\begingroup$

I have a set $\beta$ of all ultrafilters on $\mathbb{N}$, and I have shown that the sets $\mathcal{O}_A:= \{\mathcal U \in \beta: A \in \mathcal U\}$ form a basis of a hausdorff topology $\mathcal{T}$, in which all sets of the basis are closed and open.

I would now like to show that the space $(\beta, \mathcal{T})$ is compact, by showing that every cover of $\beta$ by basis sets have a finite subcover.

I am not really sure how to do this.. I have tried proving by contradiction, and got:

Suppose there exist sets $A_i$, $i \in I$ with $\cup_{i \in I} \mathcal{O}_{A_i} \supseteq \beta$, such that for all finite subsets $E$ of $I$ the finite subcover $\cup_{i \in E} \mathcal{O}_{A_i}$ does not overlap $\beta$. Then, for arbitrary $E$ we have that there exists an ultrafilter $U \in \beta$ with $A_e \not \in U$ for all $e \in E$, which is equivalent to $(A_e)^C \in U$, since ultrafilters contain a set, or the complement of that set.

I tried intersecting these sets, but I cannot seem to find any contradiction.. Any help on what I could do would be greatly appreciated!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ See the section on the Wallman extension in the chapter on Compact spaces in "General Topology" by R. Engelking. I think there is a recent textbook by Terence Tao that covers this too. $\endgroup$ – DanielWainfleet Oct 21 '17 at 22:53
1
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $\mathscr{A} = \{ A_i : i \in I\}$ does not have a finite subset covering $\mathbb{N}$. Then the family

$$\mathscr{C} = \{ \mathbb{N}\setminus A_i : i \in I\}$$

generates a filter $\mathscr{F}$ on $\mathbb{N}$. Let $\mathscr{U}$ be an ultrafilter containing $\mathscr{F}$. Then

$$\mathscr{U} \notin \bigcup_{i \in I} \mathcal{O}_{A_i},$$

which contradicts the assumption that $\{ \mathcal{O}_{A_i} : i \in I\}$ is a cover of $\beta$.

Hence there is a finite $E \subset I$ such that

$$\mathbb{N} = \bigcup_{i \in E} A_i.$$

Conclude that

$$\beta = \bigcup_{i \in E} \mathcal{O}_{A_i}.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much. Would you mind explaining why $\mathscr{C}$ forms a filterbasis? I can see that the empty set is not contained in it, but how can we guarantee that for $U,V \in \mathscr{C}$ there exists a $W \in \mathscr{C}$ with $W \subseteq U \cap V$ ? $\endgroup$ – Jack4t3 Oct 21 '17 at 16:02
  • $\begingroup$ In general, $\mathscr{C}$ is not a filter basis, only a filter subbasis. The family of finite intersections of members of $\mathscr{C}$ is a filter basis. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Oct 21 '17 at 16:04
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, this makes all sense now! $\endgroup$ – Jack4t3 Oct 21 '17 at 16:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.