0
$\begingroup$

This is statement 10.16 in Rudin's Functional Analysis. I just need help clarifying a statement.

$V, W $ are open sets in $X$ with $V\subseteq W$ and $\partial V \cap W = \emptyset $. Then $V$ is a union of components of $W$.

Proof: Let $\Omega$ be a component of $W$ that intersects $V$. Then as $V$open, $X = V \cup \partial V \cup \overline{V}^c$ and this is a disjoint union. As $\Omega \subseteq W $ and $W \cap \partial V = \emptyset$, then $ \Omega = (\Omega \cap V) \cup (\Omega \cap \overline{V}^c)$, a disjoint union of open sets. As $\Omega $ is connected, $\Omega = (\Omega \cap V)$ that is $\Omega \subseteq V$ and the result follows.

So my problem is in seeing $\Omega \cap V$ and $\Omega \cap \overline{V}^c$ as open subsets of $X$ or $W$. If $X$ were locally connected, then there is no issue but that wasn't assumed in the text. I'm assuming the result would follow from openness of $W$ but I can't see how.

EDIT: So I think I've scrapped together a solution avoiding the openness problem. Could anyone verify if it is correct for me?

Viewing $V$ and $\Omega$ as sets in space $W$, we have $\partial_WV \subseteq \partial V \cap W$ so $\partial_W V = \emptyset$. $V$ is open in $W$ so $W = V \cup \partial _W V \cup W \setminus cl_W(V) = V \cup W \setminus cl_W(V)$, a disjoint union of open sets in $W$. $\Omega \subseteq W$ and $\Omega$ would be partitioned by $V$ and $ W \setminus cl_W(V)$. As $\Omega$ connected and intersects $V$, then $\Omega \subseteq V$ as wanted.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

They don't necessairily have to be open sets of $X$ nor $W$:

We say that the topological space $\Omega$ (viewed as a topological space itself, in this case, with the subspace topology of $X$) admits a disconnection if $\Omega=A \cup B$ with $A,B$ disjoint nonempty, open sets of $\Omega$. We say that a topological space is connected if it admits no disconnection.

In the present case, both of the sets $\Omega \cap V$ and $\Omega \cap \overline{V}^c$ are open in $\Omega$ since they are the intersection of an open set of $X$ with $\Omega$, which is precisely the condition we need, to use the hyphotesis of $\Omega$ being connected.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this was a really silly question in hindsight $\endgroup$ – E.Lim Oct 20 '17 at 6:43
1
$\begingroup$

Rudin means the disjiont open sets are open in $\Omega$, not necessarily in $W$ or $X$.

A subset $Y$ of a topological space $X$ is called disconnected if $Y$ is disconnected as a subspace of $X$ or there are two disjiont open subsets of $X$ with nonempty intersection with $Y$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm having trouble seeing how they satisfy the condition. Could you spell it out for me? Also is there a standard result showing how one boundary is a subset of another boundary? $\endgroup$ – E.Lim Oct 18 '17 at 14:30
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, the original answer is questionable. I have made an edit. $\endgroup$ – C.Ding Oct 19 '17 at 8:50
  • $\begingroup$ Right, I was being silly, didn't think of $\Omega$ as a space itself. $\endgroup$ – E.Lim Oct 20 '17 at 6:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.