1
$\begingroup$

We are given the following SDE:

$$dX_t=X_tdt+\sqrt{2}X_tdB_t, \quad X_0=1,$$

and

$$F(x,t)=e^{-t}x,\quad t\geq0,\; x\in\mathbb{R}.$$

We are asked to apply Ito's formula to $F(t,X_t)$ for $t\geq0$ and determine a continuous local martingale $(M_t)_{t\geq0}$ (starting at $0$) and a continuous bounded variation process $(A_t)_{t\geq0}$ such that $F(t,X_t)=M_t+A_t$ for $t\geq0$.

If I am correct, $M_t=\int_0^tF_x(s,X_s)dX_s=\int_0^te^{-s}ds+\sqrt{2}\int_0^te^{-s}dB_s$, $t\geq0$

Now, we need to show that $M_t$ is a martingale and compute $\langle M,M\rangle_t$ and $\mathbb{E}[e^{-\tau}X_\tau]$ when $\tau=\inf\{t\geq0:X_t=2-t\}$ but I don't know how! Any help would be appreciated!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ when you write $\int \pi dB + \int f dt$ the first first term is the martingale part and the second is $A(t)$, if it is going to be a martingale, the second must be 0. Also, the QV of this process is always $\int \pi^2 dt$ whose expectation gives you the Ito isometry, also, in a pinch, you can solve this SDE explicitly and get a geometric brownian motion $\endgroup$ – mike Nov 29 '12 at 14:44
  • $\begingroup$ I succeeded in calculating the integral...hopefully it's helpful for you. $\endgroup$ – saz Nov 30 '12 at 12:26
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! The proof is a little demanding but it was really helpful! $\endgroup$ – Nick Papadopoulos Dec 1 '12 at 11:19
0
$\begingroup$

It's not difficult to see that

$$X_t := \exp \left(\sqrt{2} B_t \right)$$

solves the given SDE. (You can either use Itô's formula to check it or use some standard methods for linear SDE's to obtain this solution.) Moreover, by Ito's formula:

$$f(t,X_t)-\underbrace{f(0,x_0)}_{x_0} = \sqrt{2} \int_0^t e^{-s} \cdot X_s \, dB_s + \int_0^t e^{-s} \cdot X_s + (-e^{-s} \cdot X_s) \, ds \\ = \sqrt{2} \int_0^t e^{-s} \cdot e^{\sqrt{2} B_s} \,dB_s \\ \Rightarrow f(t,X_t) = \underbrace{\sqrt{2} \int_0^t e^{\sqrt{2} B_s-s} \,dB_s}_{M_t} + \underbrace{x_0}_{A_t}$$

where $x_0=1$. Let

$$g(s,w) := \sqrt{2} \cdot e^{\sqrt{2} B(s,w)-s}$$

Then $g \in L^2(\lambda_T \otimes \mathbb{P})$, i.e.

$$\int_0^T \int_\Omega g(s,w)^2 \, d\mathbb{P} \, ds <\infty$$

There is a general result which says that this condition implies that $M_t$ is a martingale (and not only a local one). Moreover,

$$\langle M,M \rangle_t = \int_0^t |g(s,w)|^2 \, ds$$

(see René L. Schilling/Lothar Partzsch: "Brownian Motion - An Introduction to stochastic processes", Theorem 14.13).

Concerning the integral $\mathbb{E}(e^{-\tau} \cdot X_\tau)$: Remark that

$$\tau = \inf\{t \geq 0; X_t=2-t\} = \inf\{t \geq 0; \sqrt{2} B_t = \ln(2-t)\}$$

Now let

$$\sigma := 2\tau = \inf\{t \geq 0; \underbrace{\sqrt{2} B_{\frac{t}{2}}}_{=:W_t} = \ln (2-t/2)\}$$

where $(W_t)_{t \geq 0}$ is again a Brownian Motion (scaling property). Thus

$$\mathbb{E}(e^{-\tau} \cdot X_\tau) = \mathbb{E}(e^{-\tau+\sqrt{2} B_\tau}) = \mathbb{E}(e^{-\frac{\sigma}{2}+W_\sigma}) \stackrel{\ast}{=} 1$$

In $(\ast)$ we applied the exponential Wald identity (see remark).

Remark Exponential Wald identity: Let $(W_t)_{t \geq 0}$ a Brownian motion and $\sigma$ a $\mathcal{F}_t^W$-stopping time such that $\mathbb{E}e^{\sigma/2}<\infty$, then $\mathbb{E}(e^{W_\sigma-\frac{\sigma}{2}})=1$. (see René L. Schilling/Lothar Partzsch: "Brownian Motion - An Introduction to stochastic processes", Theorem 5.14)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Please correct me if I'm wrong but when we apply Ito's formula to the function $F(t,x)=e^{-t}x$, we have:$ F(t,X_t)= F(0,X_0)+\displaystyle{\int_0^tF_t(s,X_s)ds}+\displaystyle{\int_0^tF_x(s,X_s)dB_s}+\dfrac{1}{2}\displaystyle{\int_0^tF_{xx}(s,X_s)d\left<X,X\right>_s}=1-\int_0^te^{-s}X_sds+\int_0^te^{-s}dB_s$ Isn't that right? $\endgroup$ – Nick Papadopoulos Dec 5 '12 at 17:55
  • $\begingroup$ No. The second integral should be $\int_0^t F_x(s,X_s) \, dX_s$. $\endgroup$ – saz Dec 5 '12 at 18:51
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, yet another typo... So, $\int_0^te^{-s}dX_s=\int_0^te^{-s}X_sds+\int_0^t\sqrt{2}e^{-s}X_sdB_s$ and now I get it! Thank you very much saz! $\endgroup$ – Nick Papadopoulos Dec 6 '12 at 10:21
  • $\begingroup$ Exactly, that's it :) $\endgroup$ – saz Dec 6 '12 at 10:36
  • $\begingroup$ Shouldn't we prove that $\mathbb{E}[e^{\sigma/2}]<\infty$? $\endgroup$ – Nick Papadopoulos Dec 7 '12 at 12:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.