2
$\begingroup$

I want to know whether my attempt for the following proof is correct:

Let $(f_n)_{n\in \mathbb N}$ be a sequence of entire functions converging uniformly on $\partial D$ (boundary of the unit disk, i.e. unit circle) to some function $g: \partial D \to \mathbb C$. Show that there exists a holomorphic function $f: D \to \mathbb C$ such that $f_n(z) \to f(z)$ for each $z\in D$.

My attempt: By the Cauchy integral formula, the function $\tilde g: D \to \mathbb C$, $$z\mapsto \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\partial D}\frac{g(\zeta)}{\zeta -z}d\zeta$$ is holomorphic on $D$. Now, for each $z\in D$:

$$\lim_{n\to \infty} f_n(z) = \lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{\partial D}\frac{f_n(\zeta)}{\zeta -z}d\zeta = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{\partial D}\lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{f_n(\zeta)}{\zeta -z}d\zeta = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\partial D}\frac{g(\zeta)}{\zeta -z}d\zeta$$ where we exchanged limit and integral by uniform convergence. So $\tilde g$ is our desired function.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How do you use Cauchy intergral formula to show that $\tilde{g}$ is holomorphic? $\endgroup$ – Adayah Oct 13 '17 at 11:05
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know. I thought the so defined function is always holomorphic inside of the disk. $\endgroup$ – Staki42 Oct 13 '17 at 11:55
  • $\begingroup$ It is, but I don't see how to use the Cauchy formula to prove it. I would compute the derivative from the definition instead. $\endgroup$ – Adayah Oct 13 '17 at 12:43
  • $\begingroup$ Well, it was poorly put by me. I used the formula for the proof, but it doesn't follow from the formula that the so defined function is holomorphic. $\endgroup$ – Staki42 Oct 13 '17 at 13:11
  • $\begingroup$ The fact that it's holomorphic on the inside of the disk is a standard thing. What is not clear is that-with this definition on the inside- the function is continuous on the closed disk. That was not part of the problem, but it should be, as seen in some solution provided. $\endgroup$ – Orest Bucicovschi Oct 13 '17 at 15:33
1
$\begingroup$

By the maximum principle: $$ \sup_{z\in D} |f_n(z)-f_m(z)| \le \sup_{z\in \partial D} |f_n(z)-f_m(z)| $$ so $\{ f_n \}$ is uniformly Cauchy on $\bar D$. Hence $f_n$ converges uniformly to some (necessarily holomorphic on $D$ and continuous on $\bar D$) function $f$, where $f = g$ on $\partial D$.

The fact that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$ follows, for example, from Morera's theorem: If $\gamma$ is any closed curve in $D$, then $$ \int_\gamma f\,dz = \int_\gamma (\lim_{n\to\infty} f_n)\,dz = \lim_{n\to\infty} \int_\gamma f_n\,dz = 0 $$ by Cauchy's integral theorem and properties of uniform convergence. Hence $f$ is holomorphic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That's a neat solution. So is my try completely false or does it have correct parts? $\endgroup$ – Staki42 Oct 13 '17 at 12:26
  • $\begingroup$ @lappen68 Your attempt can be saved, but you need to show that your $\tilde g$ is holomorphic. (Either you need to know a little bit about the Cauchy transform, or you can prove it directly.) $\endgroup$ – mrf Oct 13 '17 at 12:33
  • $\begingroup$ Alright. I thought that was an obvious thing, but I guess it's not. thanks! $\endgroup$ – Staki42 Oct 13 '17 at 12:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.