Set up, but do not evaluate, an integral that represents the length of the following curve.

$$\left\{\begin{array}{rl} x &= t-t^2\\ y &= \frac{4}{3}t^{3/2}\end{array}\right. \qquad\qquad 1 \leq t \leq 2$$

My solution:

First of all, I find derivative




Since parameter $t$ ranges from $t=1$ to $t=2$ we see that



$$(x(2),y(2))=(-2, \frac{8\sqrt{2}}{3})$$

It is easy to see in integrating formula we should begin from $x=-2 \ (t=2)$ to $x=0 \ (t=1)$. So length of this parametric curve is $$L=\int \limits_{2}^{1}\sqrt{(1-2t)^2+4t}\ dt$$ But it is obvious that this integral has negative value. What's wrong?

Why should upper limit be 2 and lower limit be 1. I can not grasp this question for quite long period of time. Please help.

ADDITION: Suppose we have an ellipse in parametric equations $x=a\cos \theta, \ y=b\sin \theta, \ \theta \in[0,2\pi]$. And we want to find its area. Is we compute the integral $\int \limits_{0}^{2\pi}{b\sin \theta (a\cos \theta)' d\theta}$ we will get the negative. Here we have ambiguity with arc length.

  • $\begingroup$ You shoud move your "addition" to a separate question. It has nothing to do with the arc length. $\endgroup$
    – user65203
    Oct 11, 2017 at 12:14
  • $\begingroup$ @YvesDaoust, Possibly you are right. But i attached it here in order to demonstrate what I am not able to understand. $\endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Oct 11, 2017 at 12:23

2 Answers 2


"It is easy to see in integrating formula we should begin from...": no, this is your mistake.

The values taken by $x$ are irrelevant in setting the integration bounds. (By the way, why worry about the values of $x$ rather than those of $y$, and what in case $x$ wiggles ?) You are probably confusing with an integral on $x$.

An arc length is given by

$$\int_0^s ds=\int_{t_0}^{t_1}\sqrt{\dot x^2+\dot y^2}dt$$ and is positive. As the integrand is positive, you must have $t_0<t_1$.

If you swap the integration bounds so that $t_0>t_1$, you are integrating on decreasing values of $t$ and you must compensate by using the differential $-dt$ instead of $dt$.

  • $\begingroup$ Why it is irrelevant in arc length? But it is reasonable in area. I have added example in my question. Please take a look $\endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Oct 11, 2017 at 12:13
  • $\begingroup$ @RFZ: I commented with your post. Note anyway that an arc length is always positive, by definition, while an area can have both signs and depends on an orientation convention. $\endgroup$
    – user65203
    Oct 11, 2017 at 12:15
  • $\begingroup$ Why in above example with ellipse the lower limit should $2\pi$ instead of $0$ $\endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Oct 11, 2017 at 12:32

Let function $\mathrm x : [1,2] \to \mathbb R^2$ be defined as follows

$$\mathrm x (t) := \begin{bmatrix} t-t^2\\ \frac{4}{3}t^{3/2}\end{bmatrix}$$

We would like to determine the length of the curve $\{ \mathrm x (t) \mid t \in [1,2] \}$, which is given by the integral

$$\ell := \int_1^2 \| \dot{\mathrm x} (t) \|_2 \, \mathrm d t = \int_1^2 \sqrt{(1-2t)^2 + 4 t} \, \mathrm d t$$

Note that the integration is carried out from endpoint $\mathrm a := \mathrm x (1)$ to endpoint $\mathrm b := \mathrm x (2)$. If, instead, we want to integrate from endpoint $\mathrm b$ to endpoint $\mathrm a$, then let $\tau := 2 - t$ and compute the integral

$$\int_0^1 \| \dot{\mathrm x} (2-\tau) \|_2 \, \mathrm d \tau = \int_0^1 \sqrt{(2\tau-3)^2 + 4 (2-\tau)} \, \mathrm d \tau$$

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks but my question is bit different. I am asking why we are not begining from $t=2$ to $t=1$? because $t=2$ is left endpoint $\endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Oct 11, 2017 at 12:00
  • $\begingroup$ The integral is over $t$, not over $x$. You are computing a length, not an area. $\endgroup$ Oct 11, 2017 at 12:02
  • $\begingroup$ Exactly. Because couple of hours ago i was learning also about an area. Why in are we take direction into account? Could you expand it in detail? I would be very grateful for help $\endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Oct 11, 2017 at 12:04
  • $\begingroup$ When you compute area, you add slices of infinitesimal area. Here, we are adding infinitesimal bits of the curve. $\endgroup$ Oct 11, 2017 at 12:07
  • $\begingroup$ I will edit my question. Please take a look $\endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Oct 11, 2017 at 12:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.