I know that


and I can prove it using the Principle of Mathematical Induction. Now, I am trying to gain a physical explanation of why it is true, but am having trouble.

I am assuming that such an understanding is valuable. If you think this is a waste of time, please let me know why you think so.

I tried to visualize the sum of squares using blocks and see it that would contain $\frac{1}{6}$ the number of blocks as a large cube of blocks with dimension $n\times(n+1)\times(2n+1)$. Using this method, I noticed that


but that didn't help me understand the original equation.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why is the induction proof insufficient to demonstrate why it is true? $\endgroup$ – Emily Nov 28 '12 at 17:48
  • $\begingroup$ Good point. I revised the question to say I am looking for a physical explanation of why it is true. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Liu Nov 28 '12 at 17:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Look at the beautiful color slide in this presentation (I haven't looked at the references below to know if they are the same): math.berkeley.edu/~rbayer/09su-55/handouts/ProofByPicture.pdf $\endgroup$ – Amzoti Nov 28 '12 at 18:32
  • $\begingroup$ Also, see Theorem 7 - very nice here: www.ejpam.com/index.php/ejpam/article/download/546/96 $\endgroup$ – Amzoti Nov 28 '12 at 18:43

See my question here. In particular, follow the link to the pictures of wooden blocks.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.