1
$\begingroup$

I am really new to analysis, and am taking an analysis 1 course. I did problem 3 part (iv) in spivak's calculus, but am really unsure if I am doing this problem's correctly. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

So the question asks prove the limit exists of:

$\lim\limits_{x\rightarrow a}{f(x)}=l$ where $f(x) = x^4 $ and a is arbitrary.

So here's what I did

$\lim\limits_{x\rightarrow a}{f(x)}= f(a) = a^4$

                                                    Let a = 1 given ε>0 Let δ=1

$|x-1|<1 $                                                             $ |f(x)-l| < ε $

$0<x<2$                                                               $|x^4 - a^4|<ε $

$|x-a|< δ $                                                             $|x-a||x+a||x^2+a^2|<|x+a||x^2+a^2|δ $

                                                             

$|x+a||x^2+a^2| = |x+a||x^2+a^2| $

$|x+a||x^2+a^2| < |2+1||2^2+1^2| $

$|x+a||x^2+a^2| < 15 $

So

$0<|x-a|<δ=min(1,ε/15) => |f(x)-l|= |x^4-a^4| = |x−a||x+a||x^2+a^2|$

$< δ|x+a||x^2+a^2| < 15*δ = 15*(ε/15) = ε $

Someone please help me out on this, I have no idea if I answered it right or not, and I don't want to go into the test thinking I'm doing these correctly when I'm not.

By this took me 2 hours to write out because I didn't know how to use the TeX commands, so please no bullshit answers or comments.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Here's a bullshit comment: the problem asked you to do this for arbitrary $a$ and you did it for the single specific case of $a=1$. $\endgroup$ – Randall Oct 9 '17 at 0:34
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, so how would I do this for some arbitrary a? $\endgroup$ – gunnersFc Oct 9 '17 at 0:36
  • $\begingroup$ plllssssssssss helpppp $\endgroup$ – gunnersFc Oct 9 '17 at 1:35
0
$\begingroup$

You are on the right track, you need to try to use this argument for general $a$ rather than just $a=1$. The key formula that you have found which allows you to do this is: $$|x^{4}-a^{4}|=|x-a||x+a||x^2+a^2|.$$

We want to show that this expression becomes arbitrarily small as $|x-a|$ becomes arbitrarily small. Therefore, all we really need to do is ensure that the terms $|x+a|$ and $|x^2+a^2|$ are bounded as $x\rightarrow a$. Let's make this more precise.

Observe that if $|x-a|<1$, then we have $(a-1)<x<(a+1)$. Adding $a$ shows that $(2a-1)<(x+a)<(2a+1)$.

By taking $R_{a}=\max\{|2a+1|,|2a-1|\}$, we see that if $|x-a|<1$, we have $$|x+a|<R_{a}.$$ The key point is we can bound $|x+a|$ by a positive constant $R_{a}>0$ (which will depend on $a$) provided we first bound $|x-a|$. This is similar to what you did when you showed that, for $a=1$, you had $|x+a|<|2+1|$, so you used $R_{1}=3$.

Similarly, if $|x-a|<1$, we have either $(a-1)^{2}<x^{2}<(a+1)^{2}$ or $(a+1)^{2}<x^{2}<(a-1)^{2}$ depending on the value of $a$ (specifically whether we have $-1\leqslant a\leqslant 1$ or not). In either case, we can find some constant $S_{a}>0$ such that, if $|x-a|<1$, then $$|x^{2}+a^{2}|<S_{a}.$$ Again, this is similar to what you did when you showed that, for $a=1$, you had $|x^{2}+a^{2}|<|2^{2}+1^{2}|$, so you used $S_{1}=5$.

Now we can complete the proof. Given a real number $a$ and some $\varepsilon>0$, define $R_{a}$ and $S_{a}$ as above. Now define $\delta=\delta_{a,\varepsilon}$ (that is, $\delta$ depends on $a$ and $\varepsilon$) by $$\delta=\min\left\lbrace1,\frac{\varepsilon}{R_{a}S_{a}} \right\rbrace.$$

This may seem a strange choice of $\delta$, but it is made so that $\delta\leqslant1$, and $\delta R_{a}S_{a}\leqslant\varepsilon$. You did this with $a=1$ by taking $\delta=\min\left\lbrace1,\frac{\varepsilon}{15}\right\rbrace$.

Putting this all together, if $|x-a|<\delta$, then we have \begin{align} |x^{4}-a^{4}| & = |x-a||x+a||x^2+a^2| \\ & < \delta|x+a||x^2+a^2| \\ & < \delta R_{a}S_{a} \\ & \leqslant \varepsilon. \end{align} This completes the proof.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks you! This ties up some ideas I had. Just a couple of questions I wanted to ask. When you were defining the constant $Ra$ couldn't you just let it equal $|2a+1|$? I thought taking $Ra=max|2a+1|,|2a−1|$ was a little redundant, considering $|2a+1|> |2a−1|$. Also, for clarification, the constant $Sa$ you considered the two cases of $x^2$ because you didn't know if a was positive or negative correct? Just one more thing that's bothering me, we didn't really get an explicit bound on $Sa$ like we did on $Ra$, why is that? $\endgroup$ – gunnersFc Oct 9 '17 at 3:27
  • $\begingroup$ @gunnersFc Actually, $|2a+1|> |2a−1|$ holds if and only if $a>0$ (try $a=-1$ to see it fail). From this you can find $R_{a}$ explicitly for each value of $a$. In the case of $S_{a}$ you can also compute it exactly if you want. I did not do so because it again requires you to look at different values of $a$ and perform a few calculations that I felt weren't necessary to explain the proof. You can compute $S_{a}$ exactly if you wish, but the point is just that $|x^{2}+a^{2}|$ can be bounded when $|x-a|$ is bounded. $\endgroup$ – JonCC Oct 9 '17 at 3:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.