0
$\begingroup$

Here is the problem I'm trying to prove :

Let $F$ be a subset of $C([a,b])$. If each sequence in $F$ contains a uniformly convergent sequence, then $F$ is both equicontinuous and uniformly bounded.

As the assumption said, I let {$f_n$} be a sequence in $F$, so that there exists a subsequence {$f_{1,_k}$} which converges uniformly.

Since {$ {f_n} $} $\setminus$ {$f_{n_k}$} is still a sequence in $F$, so there also exists a uniformly convergent subsequence
{$f_{2,_k}$} in it.

Continue this process, I get a family of sequence {$f_{t,_k}$} with $\bigcup _t$ {$f_{t,_k}$} = {$f_n$}, and each {$f_{t,_k}$} is uniformly convergent.

Now I want to prove the result by showing that any {$f_n$} is equicontinuous and uniformly bounded, then $F$ will be. So I foucus on analyzing each {$f_{t,_k}$}. But evey method I've tried was stopped because of lacking of condition.

I don't know what I should do to keep going.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Have you already seen the proof of Arzela-Ascoli (which is essentially the converse of this statement)? $\endgroup$ – Ian Oct 5 '17 at 2:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Ian Yes, I have. I followed how it was proved by writhing each subsequence down, and tried to use diagonal process. But I can't find out any relation between two different {$f_{t,k}$}. $\endgroup$ – Hung Oct 5 '17 at 3:01
0
$\begingroup$

Hint: In fact $F \subseteq C[a,b]$ is a compact set under sup-norm so it is bounded which in language of functions means uniformly bounded.

For equicontinuouty proceed proof by contradiction and try to extract a subsequence which does not have convergent subsequence

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Appreciate! I'll try what you said. $\endgroup$ – Hung Oct 5 '17 at 3:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.