My prof made an offhand remark about this in class and didn't go into detail. I've took a bit of stats before and to me these two statements seem identical, I don't see how they're different.

I also found this question; is this what my prof is referring to:

Set Addition vs. Set Union

If it is, I'm not sure how does Minkowski addition fits into linear algebra.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $U\cup W$ is not a vector space, in general. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Oct 5 '17 at 1:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Consider $U$ the $x$-axis in $\Bbb R^2$ and $W$ the $y$-axis in $\Bbb R^2$. Then $U\cup W$ are the axes and only the axes, i.e. have at least one coordinate zero. $U+W$ however is the entirety of $\Bbb R^2$. $\endgroup$ – JMoravitz Oct 5 '17 at 1:15

The definitions couldn't be more different : Let $U,W$ be vector spaces.

$U \cup W = \{x \in U \textrm{ or } x \in W\}$.

$U + W = \{x + y : x \in U, y \in W\}$.

An vector is in $U \cup W$ if and only if it is either in $U$ or in $W$ or in both.

A vector is in $U + W$ if and only if it is the sum of two (not necessarily distinct or unique) vectors from $U$ and $W$ respectively.

To give you an example, let's consider the vector subspaces of $\mathbb R^2$, given by $U = \{(x,y) : x = 2y\}$, and $W = \{(x,y) : x = 3y\}$. You can clearly see that these are vector spaces : they are closed under addition and scalar multiplication.

What is an element of $U \cup W$? As sets in $\mathbb R^2$, $U$ and $W$ are just lines passing through the origin. So as a set, $U \cup W$ is just two lines passing through the origin. From this image, we conclude that it cannot be a subspace either.

But what is $U + W$? This is the set of all possible sums of elements from $U$ and $W$. That is, if $(2a,a) \in U$ and $(3b,b) \in W$, then an element of $U+W$ is $(2a+3b,a+b)$.

We claim that $U+W = \mathbb R^2$. To see this, let $(x,y) \in \mathbb R^2$. We want $(x,y) = (2a+3b,a+b)$ for some $a,b$. It's easy to see that if we choose $a = 3y-x, b = x-2y$, then infact this holds true. In other words, if we take the point $(2a,a) \in U$ and $(3b,b) \in V$, then their sum is $(x,y)$. Since $x,y$ were arbitrary, we conclude that $U + W = \mathbb R^2$.

Hence, clearly $U \cup W$ and $U + W$ are different sets. In fact, more often than not they will be very different from each other. For one, $U \cup W$ is not a subspace most of the time,while $U + W$ is always a subspace.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's worth noting that they are not completely unrelated sets: certainly $U \cup W \subseteq U + W$, and in fact $U+W$ is the subspace generated by $U \cup W$. $\endgroup$ – Bungo Oct 5 '17 at 1:19
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that is correct. Thank you for the comment. $\endgroup$ – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг Oct 5 '17 at 1:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Bungo: I'm not seeing how U + W can be generate from U∪W $\endgroup$ – L to the V Oct 5 '17 at 1:27
  • $\begingroup$ @LtotheV Every element of $U+W$ is of the form $u + w$ where $u \in U$ and $w \in W$. As $U \subseteq U \cup W$ and $W \subseteq U \cup W$, this means that an arbitrary element of $U+W$ is the sum of two elements contained in $U\cup W$. $\endgroup$ – Bungo Oct 5 '17 at 1:31

For example, let $$ U=\{(x,0): \ x\in\mathbb{R}\}, W=\{(0,y): \ y\in\mathbb{R}\}. $$ Then $$ U\cup W=\{(x,y): \ x=0\text{ or }y=0\}, U+W=\{(x,y): \ x,y\in\mathbb{R}\}=\mathbb{R}^2. $$ You see the difference.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.