My question concerns two experiments with different rules, but with the same probabilities. I was wondering, is there is an intuitive explanation for this equality, or is it is a coincidence?

Suppose that when Alice and Bob play chess, Alice wins with probability $p$ independently of previous games.

Game 1: Alice and Bob start with $n$ dollars each. They play chess over and over. Each time, the loser pays the winner a dollar, until someone runs out of money.

Let $q=1-p$. Using the classic gambler's ruin formula, $$ P(\text{Alice wins Game 1}) = \frac{1-(\frac{q}p)^n}{1-(\frac{q}p)^{2n}} = \frac{1}{1+(\frac{q}p)^n} = \frac{p^n}{p^n+q^n} $$

Game 2: Alice and Bob play $n$ games of chess. If one of them wins all $n$ games, they immediately win the series. Otherwise, they repeat, playing blocks of $n$ games until someone wins them all.

Obviously, $$ P(\text{Alice wins Game 2}) = \frac{p^n}{p^n+q^n} $$

  • $\begingroup$ Interesting question (+1) $\endgroup$
    – Peter
    Sep 28 '17 at 22:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A slight generalization of what you wrote: if we condition on the length of gambler's ruin to be $n + 2k$, then for any $k$ the probability Alice wins is $\frac{p^n}{p^n + q^n}$; the second game is the case when $k = 0$. I don't see why this is true combinatorially, but it's not too bad to write out the conditional probability statement to prove that. $\endgroup$
    – Marcus M
    Sep 29 '17 at 0:21
  • $\begingroup$ @MarcusM That's a very illuminating comment, thank you! $\endgroup$ Sep 29 '17 at 1:54

The probability that Alice wins each game in a block is $p^n$ and the probability that neither win each game in a block is $1-(p^n + q^n)$. Let $\tau$ be the probability Alice eventually wins each game in a block. Since each block of games is independent, we have $$ \tau = p^n + (1-(p^n+q^n))\tau, $$ which yields $$\tau = \frac{p^n}{p^n+q^n}.$$


I think there is nothing too deep going on here. Consider the set of paths where the game's length is $2k$. Let $A$ be the set of paths where Alice wins, and $B$ be the set of paths where Bob wins. There is an obvious bijection between $A$ and $B$ (vertical reflection). Furthermore, all paths in $A$ have the same unconditional probability, as do all paths in $B$, and the probability of the latter is $q^n/p^n$ times that of the former. It immediately follows that, conditional on the game lasting $2k$ rounds, the probability that $A$ wins is $1/(1+(q/p)^n)$. Since the conditional probability is independent of $k$, it follows the unconditional probability is equal to this same value.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.