Why does it takes more parameters to define an Apollonius circle than an ordinary one? When defining an Apollonius circle, in $\mathbb{R}^2$, 5 parameters are required: $(x_A, y_A), (x_B, y_B)$ and the ratio $\lambda$. But for circles’ ordinary definition, only 3 parameters: center location $(x_c, y_c)$ and radius $r$ are needed. Different numbers of parameters return the same result, why?
 A: An Apollonius circle is defined as the locus of the points $P$ such that the ratio $PA/PB$ of the distances from two fixed points $A$ and $B$ is a given positive number $\lambda$.
Given a circle, however, there are infinitely many triads $(A, B, \lambda)$ having that circle as their Apollonius circle. 
Consider, for example, the circle in the cartesian plane with equation $x^2+y^2=1$: it is the Apollonius circle of all $(A,B,\lambda)$ with $A$ and $B$ given by: 
$A=(\lambda,0)$, $B=(1/\lambda,0)$. And if you rotate each couple $(A,B)$ around the circle center, the rotated points $(A',B')$ define the same Apollonius circle with the same ratio $\lambda$.
In summary, that circle is the Apollonius circle of all the triads:
$$
A=(\lambda\cos\theta,\lambda\sin\theta),\quad
B=\left({\cos\theta\over\lambda},{\sin\theta\over \lambda}\right),\quad
\lambda.
$$
These depend on two free parameters $\theta$ and $\lambda$: that explains the difference between five parameters of Apollonius' definition and three parameters of the ordinary definition.
