6
$\begingroup$

I want to prove that, if $(X, \tau)$ is Hausdorff and $A\subseteq X$ is non empty then $A'$ the set of accumulation points is closed in $X$.

My reasoning:

$x \in X \setminus A' \rightarrow \exists\ U \subseteq X $ s.t. $x\in U$, $U$ is open and $U \cap A \subseteq \{x\} $

Now by Hausdorff condition, $\{x\}$ is closed and hence $(X\setminus \{x\}) \cap U = U\setminus \{x\}$ is open as well.

Let $y \in U$ if $y\not = x $ then $y\in U\setminus \{x\}$ and $U\setminus \{x\} \cap A = \emptyset$

so $y\in X\setminus A'$ hence, as $x \in X\setminus A'$,

$U\subseteq X\setminus A'$ and $X\setminus A'$ is open, giving the result.

Now, I am not completely sure, I do not think I used the Hausdorff condition fully as I only needed the first separation axiom (implied by Hausdorff) ...

What do you think? thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It looks fine; all you need is $T_1$. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott Nov 23 '12 at 15:36
  • $\begingroup$ ah ok thank you! it seemed strange that they gave me more than i needed! $\endgroup$ – Moritzplatz Nov 23 '12 at 15:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It’s quite common to deal only with Hausdorff spaces, even when less separation is sufficient. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott Nov 23 '12 at 15:54
2
$\begingroup$

Your proof is correct. You only need the $T_1$ property.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.