0
$\begingroup$

Does the Lie derivative of a symmetric $(1,1)$- tensor along a non-vanishing vector field remain symmetric? If the answer is positive how to prove it, else does the following equation hold?

$$g((\mathscr{L}_VT)X,V)\stackrel{?}{=}g(X,(\mathscr{L}_VT)V),\qquad\forall X\in \mathfrak{X}(M).$$

where $(M,g)$ is a Riemannian manifold and $T$ a symmetric $(1,1)$- tensor and $V$ is a non-vanishing vector field.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

In general, the Lie derivative of a symmetric $(1,1)$-tensor need not be symmetric. The basic reason is because "symmetry" of a $(1,1)$-tensor really means self-adjointness, which depends on the metric. So unless $V$ is a Killing vector field (meaning $\mathscr L_V g\equiv 0$), there's no reason to expect $\mathscr L_V T$ to be symmetric when $T$ is.

Now the identity you asked about is a little weaker than saying $\mathscr L_V T$ is self-adjoint, because one of the vectors you're applying $\mathscr L_V T$ to is $V$ itself. But even this weaker identity need not hold if $V$ is not a Killing vector field.

Here's a counterexample. In $\mathbb R^2$ with the Euclidean metric, let \begin{align*} T &= \partial_ x \otimes dy + \partial_y \otimes dx,\\ V &= y\partial_y,\\ X &= \partial_x. \end{align*} Then we compute \begin{align*} \mathscr L_V dx &= 0, &\mathscr L_V dy &= dy,\\ \mathscr L_V \partial_x &= 0, & \mathscr L_V \partial_y &= -\partial_y,\\ \mathscr L_V T &= \partial _x \otimes dy - \partial_y \otimes dx, \end{align*} and therefore \begin{align*} g((\mathscr L_V T)X,V) &= g(-\partial_y,y\partial_y) =-y,\\ g(X,(\mathscr L_V T)V) &= g(\partial_x,y\partial_x) =y. \end{align*}

On the other hand, if $V$ is a Killing vector field, then in fact $\mathscr L_V T$ is symmetric whenever $T$ is. Here's a proof. The fact that $V$ is a Killing vector field means $\mathscr L_V \big(g(X,Y)) = g(\mathscr L_V X,Y) + g(X,\mathscr L_V Y)$ for all vector fields $X$ and $Y$. Thus \begin{align*} 0 &= \mathscr L_V \big( g(TX,Y) - g(X,TY)\big)\\ &= g((\mathscr L_V T)X,Y) + g(T(\mathscr L_V X),Y) + g(TX,\mathscr L_V Y)\\ &\quad - g(\mathscr L_V X,TY) - g(X,(\mathscr L_V T)Y) - g(X,T(\mathscr L_V Y))\\ &= g((\mathscr L_V T)X,Y) - g(X,(\mathscr L_V T)Y), \end{align*} where in the second line, I've used $\mathscr L_V(TX) = (\mathscr L_V T)X + T(\mathscr L_V X)$, and in the last line I've canceled four terms using the fact that $T$ is self-adjoint.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Prof J. Lee. many thanks for your nice answer. and thanks so much for your beautiful book in Riemannian manifolds, I really appreciate it. $\endgroup$ – C.F.G Sep 17 '17 at 5:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.