0
$\begingroup$

This might on first glance seem like a strange question, since it can just be said that $b=e$, hence $\log_b(a)=\ln(a)$, but hear my reasoning first.

So obviously, the "change of base" formula states that $$\log_a(x)=\frac{\log_b(x)}{\log_b(a)}$$ and when $b=e$, $$\log_a(x)=\frac{\ln(x)}{\ln(a)}$$ and then to take the derivative of $y=\log_a(x)$ from here is therefore quite easy: $$\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{\ln(a)\cdot\frac{d}{dx}(\ln(x))-\ln(x)\cdot\frac{d}{dx}(\ln(a))}{(\ln(a))^2}$$ and since $\ln(a)$ is a constant,$$\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{\frac{\ln(a)}{x}}{(\ln(a))^2}=\frac{\ln(a)}{x}\cdot\frac{1}{(\ln(a))^2}=\frac{1}{x\ln(a)}$$

now whilst differentiating, I can understand why the natural log is desirable, seeing as at this point, the derivative of $\ln(x)$ is already known, my question however, is: is it necessary to let $b=e$ to easily compute the derivative? The thought is very loose, so I apologise if the question is ill-worded. Any responses are appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The short answer is yes. $\endgroup$ – Abu Bakr Sep 13 '17 at 15:37
  • $\begingroup$ For the reason you provide, yes, and for the same reason we use$$a^x=e^{x\ln(a)}$$and appropriately apply chain rule. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Sep 13 '17 at 15:40
3
$\begingroup$

The practice of converting $\log_a(\cdot)$ to $\ln(\cdot)$ is an example of "reducing a problem to the previous case", which is usually a good idea -- there are fewer formulas to remember. (And in the case of $\log_a(x)=\frac{\ln(x)}{\ln(a)}$, you don't need the quotient rule to compute the derivative; just pull out the constant $\frac1{\ln(a)}$.)

If you're not happy about the presence of $\ln(a)$ in the derivative of $\log_a(x)$, you can use the change of base formula to express $\frac1{\ln a}$ in terms of $\log_a$: $$ \frac1{\ln a}=\frac{\log_ee}{\log_ea}=\log_a(e).$$ So an alternative way to write the derivative of $\log_a(x)$ is $$ \frac d{dx}\log_a(x)=\frac{\log_a (e)}x, $$ which uses $\log_a$ instead of $\ln$. This is correct, but a slightly less attractive form (IMO).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.