3
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be a commutative ring, I always thought that finitely generated ideals are "small" and the non finitely generated ideals are "large" but this is not quite correct...

Lemma. In a non-noetherian ring $R$, there exists a maximal non finitely generated ideal w.r.t. set inclusion.

The proof is an application of Zorn's lemma.

Given the non empty collection $\mathcal{C}$ of non finitely generated ideals, if we have any ascending chain $$I_1\subset I_2\subset \cdots$$ we claim that the union $\bigcup_k I_k$ is an upper bound in $\mathcal{C}$.

$\bigcup_k I_k$ is an ideal because the union is nested, and if it is finitely generated (i.e. not in $\mathcal{C}$), then the set of finite generators must be contained in some $I_{n^*}$, and this finite set of generators would generate $I_{n^*}$ which contradicts $I_{n^*}\in \mathcal{C}$. By Zorn's lemma, there exists a maximal element in $\mathcal{C}$.

We call this maximal element $P$, then given any element $x\in R-P$, then we see that $P+\langle x\rangle$ must be finitely generated! Because $P\subsetneq P+\langle x\rangle$ and $P$ is the maximal non finitely generated ideal in $R$. So in a sense, a lot of these "large" ideals will be finitely generated.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What exactly is your question? Have you worked through any examples? E.g., rings of polynomials in infinitely many variables. $\endgroup$ – Rob Arthan Sep 9 '17 at 21:35
  • $\begingroup$ I know a few standard examples of non finitely generated ideals from Noetherian rings chapter we did. I do not really see a lot of finitely generated ideal examples it is like $\langle r_1, \cdots r_n \rangle$. I have seen polynomial ring with infinitely many variable, and for rings of formal power series, we did some exercise about it and it is a local ring. $\endgroup$ – Xiao Sep 9 '17 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps you could add something like "where is my intuition going wrong?" to make your "question" into a question. I've tried to answer that question. $\endgroup$ – Rob Arthan Sep 9 '17 at 22:16
4
$\begingroup$

Your idea that finitely generated ideals are "small" and non-finitely generated ideals are "large" is misleading. Think about $R = \Bbb{Z}[X_1, X_2, \ldots]$, the ring of polynomials over the integers in countably many variables $X_1, X_2, \ldots$ If you define $J_k = \langle X_1, \ldots, X_k\rangle$, then $J_1 \subseteq J_2 \subseteq \ldots$ is a strictly increasing chain of ideals, so $R$ is not Noetherian. The finitely generated ideal $J = \langle 2 \rangle $ properly contains the non-finitely generated ideal $K = \langle 2X_1, 2X_2, \ldots \rangle$. For any prime $p$, the ideal $L_p$ comprising the polynomials with constant term a multiple of $p$ is maximal non-finitely generated.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for the answer, I think I know where my understanding is wrong now. When I see $\langle r_1, \cdots r_n\rangle$, I always think of it as "$\text{span}\{r_1, \cdots r_n\}$" because the elements are linear combinations, but here scalars are all of $R$, so a small set does not imply small ideal. $\endgroup$ – Xiao Sep 9 '17 at 22:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.