Geometric interpretation for sum of fourth powers Summing the first $n$ first powers of natural numbers:
$$\sum_{k=1}^nk=\frac12n(n+1)$$
and there is a geometric proof involving two copies of a 2D representation of $(1+2+\cdots+n)$ that form a $n\times(n+1)$-rectangle.

Similarly,
$$\sum_{k=1}^nk^2=\frac16n(n+1)(2n+1)$$ 
has a geometric proof (scroll down just a bit til you see the wooden blocks) involving six copies of a 3D representation of $(1^2+2^2+\cdots+n^2)$ that form a $n\times(n+1)\times(2n+1)$-rectangular solid. 

And similarly,
$$\sum_{k=1}^nk^3=\frac14n^2(n+1)^2$$
has a proof involving four copies of a 4D representation of $(1^3+2^3+\cdots+n^3)$ that form a $n\times n\times(n+1)\times(n+1)$-rectangular hypersolid in four-space. I can't find a resource to demonstrate this last one better, but I've sketched it out for $n=3$, sketching the four dimensions using a $4\times4$ grid for two dimensions, and within each cell a $3\times 3$ grid for the other two. (Try it - it's fun!) Here's a smaller $n=2$ version. Note that $1^3+2^3$ is represented by some 4D blocks $1\times1^3+1\times2^3$ that are configured in a way that makes use of all four dimensions.
$$\begin{array}{c|c|c}
\begin{array}{cc}
{\color{red} \bullet} & {\color{red} \bullet}\\
{\color{red} \bullet} & {\color{red} \bullet}
\end{array} &
\begin{array}{cc}
{\color{red} \bullet} & {\color{red} \bullet}\\
{\color{red} \bullet} & {\color{red} \bullet}
\end{array} &
\begin{array}{cc}
{\color{blue} \bullet} & {\color{blue} \bullet}\\
{\color{blue} \bullet} & {\color{blue} \bullet}
\end{array} \\\hline
\begin{array}{cc}
{\color{green} \bullet} & {\color{green} \bullet}\\
{\color{green} \bullet} & {\color{green} \bullet}
\end{array} &
\begin{array}{cc}
{\color{red} \bullet} & {\color{blue} \bullet}\\
{\color{green} \bullet} & {\color{magenta} \bullet}
\end{array} &
\begin{array}{cc}
{\color{blue} \bullet} & {\color{blue} \bullet}\\
{\color{blue} \bullet} & {\color{blue} \bullet}
\end{array} \\\hline
\begin{array}{cc}
{\color{green} \bullet} & {\color{green} \bullet}\\
{\color{green} \bullet} & {\color{green} \bullet}
\end{array} &
\begin{array}{cc}
{\color{magenta} \bullet} & {\color{magenta} \bullet}\\
{\color{magenta} \bullet} & {\color{magenta} \bullet}
\end{array} &
\begin{array}{cc}
{\color{magenta} \bullet} & {\color{magenta} \bullet}\\
{\color{magenta} \bullet} & {\color{magenta} \bullet}
\end{array} \\
\end{array}$$
This is a $2\times2\times3\times3$ rectangular hypersolid made up of four copies of $1\cdot1^3+1\cdot2^3$.

So we move on to fourth powers:
$$\sum_{k=1}^nk^4=\frac1{30}n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^2+3n-1)$$
This time the polynomial does not completely factor. I would like to know if anyone can find a similar geometric proof. It would involve 30 copies of a 5D representation of $(1^4+2^4+\cdots+n^4)$ forming a 5D hypersolid, one of whose 2-faces somehow works out to have area $3n^2+3n-1$, with the orthogonal edge lengths being $n$, $n+1$, and $2n+1$. I know it seems hopeless...30 copies? $3n^2+3n-1$? But it would make for some nice art.
It would be a nice start if there were some sort of connection between $30$ and a symmetry group of $\mathbb{R}^5$. For instance, if there were a subgroup of $\operatorname{SO}_5$ whose order was some large divisor of $30$, then that might help place the $30$ blocks of volume $1^5$ into their configuration.
 A: Your construction sounds like that of the Ehrhart polynomials. Snooping around Wikipedia a bit gives us confirmation.  From the article square pyramidal number:

In modern mathematics, figurate numbers are formalized by the Ehrhart polynomials. 
The Ehrhart polynomial $L(P,t)$ of a polyhedron $P$ is a polynomial that counts the number of integer points in a copy of $P$ that is expanded by multiplying all its coordinates by the number $t$. The Ehrhart polynomial of a pyramid whose base is the unit square $[0,1]^2 \times 0$, and whose apex is an integer point at height one above the base plane $(0,0,1)$ has Ehrhart polynomial $ \frac{1}{6}(t+1)(t+2)(2t+3)$.

In your problem the choice of convex polytope is pretty clear.  It is the convex hull of the hypercube $[0,1]^4 \times 0$ and the point $(0,0,0,0,1)$.

Reading the article Ehrhart Polynomial we get some definitions:

Let $P$ be a polytope with vertices in a lattice $L$ (e.g. $L = \mathbb{Z}^d$ then) $L(P,t) = \# (tP \cap L)$ is a polynomial in $t$, called the Erhart polynomial of degree $d = \dim L$.  
The Ehrhart polynomial of the interior (those strictly inside $P$) is $L(\text{int}(P), t)= (-1)^d L(P,-t)$.

A: On this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Proofs-without-Words-Exercises-Classroom/dp/0883857006
Is given the following solution:

I guess that with a bit of calculation it is possible to get to the formula for $$\sum_{i=1}^ni^4$$
I know that we miss all the stuff about the fifth dimension... but in this way the proof is much easier to visualize...
