Is the composite of two subfields just their product? $K$ and $L$ are subfields of the field $F$. I think the composite of $K$ and $L$ (smallest subfield of $F$ containing $K$ and $L$) is just their product, namely
$$\{\sum _{i=1}^n k_i l_i |k_i\in K, l_i\in L, i=1, \dots, n, n\in \mathbb N\}. $$
But if this is true, why no book mention it?
 A: That will be the smallest ring containing both $K$ and $L$. In some cases it will not be a field. The smallest field will be the set 
$$\{ \frac{ \sum k_i l_i}{\sum k'_j l'_j}\ | \ k_i, k_j' \in K, l_i, l'_j \in L \textrm{ and } \sum k_j' l'_j \ne 0 \}$$
To see that you do not get a field in general, consider $K = \mathbb{Q}(x)$, $L = \mathbb{Q}(y)$, $K,L \subset \mathbb{Q}(x,y)$. You can check that your subset consists of all the fractions $\frac{P(x,y)}{Q(x) R(y)}$. The element $x+y$ has no inverse here. Indeed, assume that we have 
$$(x+y)\cdot \frac{P(x,y)}{Q(x)R(y)} = 1$$ that is 
$$(x+y)P(x,y) = Q(x) R(y)$$ an equality of non-zero polynomials in $x$, $y$. Now substitute $y=-x$ and get $Q(x) \cdot R(-x) = 0$, not possible.
Note however, that if $K$, $L$ both contain a sub field $F$ and $K$, $L$ algebraic over $F$, then you will get the composite field  with your construction.
A: For you to get started you need to have a bigger field $\Omega$ such that 
$F,K,L\subset\Omega$. For otherwise you have problem defining those products $k_il_i$ as well as their sums.
Anyway, you get the compositum this way if $[K:F]$ and $[L:F]$ are both finite. For then you can check that the set of such sums, call it $M$, is closed under addition and multiplication. Also, you can easily prove that $M$ is a vector space over $F$ of dimension at most $[K:F]\cdot [L:F]$. So $M$ is a finite dimensional integral domain over $F$, and therefore it is a field. 
Clearly $M$ is contained in any subfield of $\Omega$ that contains both $K$ and $L$, so it is the compositum.
