What is the number of ways to sit six people around two tables of size three each? [closed]

Problem: If at least one person must be on each table, what is the number of ways to sit six people around $(i)$ two tables $(ii)$ three tables? (it is assume that the tables are indistinguishable)

Here's a solution.

for $(i)$, we consider 3 cases

(1) 5 + 1, (2), 4 + 2 and (3) 3 + 3

around each table, the number of ways for (1) is $6 \choose 5$, for (2) is $6 \choose 4$, but what about (3)?

What is the number of ways to divide 6 people into 2 groups of size three each?(answer with explanations please).

Also, for $(ii)$, how do we handle the case of sitting 2 + 2 + 2 persons around 3 tables?

closed as off-topic by Namaste, Leucippus, Claude Leibovici, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, user223391 Dec 23 '17 at 21:59

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Namaste, Leucippus, Claude Leibovici, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, Community
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The binomial coefficient $\binom63$ counts the number of ways to pick $3$ of the six to sit at a particular table, leaving the other $3$ for the other table. If the tables are indistinguishable, then you might want to divide by $2$, so as not to count $ABC, DEF$ and $DEF,ABC$ as different divisions.
To split six people into three groups of $2$, start with $\binom62$ ways to pick out one group, times $\binom42$ ways to pick the second group, leaving the third group determined. Then, to get rid of redundant choices in different orders, you can divide by $3!$.