4
$\begingroup$

I'm reading Bressoud's A radical approach to Lebesgue theory of integration and there's a section that I don't get, please read below:

Is there a mean value theorem for integrable functions ? I know there's one for integrals of continuous functions. If the continuity assumption is dropped, I don't know what to do...

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean the Average Value Theorem, i.e. the existence of a $c \in (a, b) $ for which $$ \frac{1}{b-a} \int_a ^b f(x) \ dx = f(c) $$ provided $f$ is continuous? $\endgroup$ – Sean Roberson Aug 18 '17 at 17:23
  • $\begingroup$ math.stackexchange.com/questions/429769/… $\endgroup$ – platty Aug 18 '17 at 17:23
  • $\begingroup$ @SeanRoberson Yes, that's the one. $\endgroup$ – Gabriel Romon Aug 18 '17 at 17:25
  • $\begingroup$ @platty This does not address my question. $\endgroup$ – Gabriel Romon Aug 18 '17 at 17:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Taking a second look, I think the claim is false without further assumptions. Let $f = 1$ from $0$ to $1$ and $f = 2$ from $1$ to $2$. Taking $a=0,h=2$ implies that there is some $c \ in (0,2)$ with $f(c) = \frac{3}{2}$, unless I've fudged the numbers somewhere. $\endgroup$ – platty Aug 18 '17 at 17:37
3
$\begingroup$

Suppose $f$ is integrable (not necessarily continuous) and $\lim_{x \to a+} f(x)= L$. For any $\epsilon > 0$ there is a $\delta > 0$ such that $|f(x) - L| < \epsilon$ when $0 < x < a + \delta$.

If $0 < h < \delta$, then

$$\left|\frac{1}{h}\int_a^{a+h} f(x) \, dx - L \right| = \left|\frac{1}{h}\int_a^{a+h} (f(x) - L) \, dx \right| \leqslant\frac{1}{h}\int_a^{a+h} |f(x) - L| \, dx < \epsilon $$

Thus, $\displaystyle \lim_{h \to 0+} \frac{1}{h}\int_a^{a+h} f(x) \, dx = L$.

A similar argument applies to the left-hand limit. The mean value theorem for integrals is not needed (nor does it apply to discontinuous functions.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, there's a mistake in the book, as I suspected. $\endgroup$ – Gabriel Romon Aug 18 '17 at 18:57
  • $\begingroup$ This is another mistake is Bressoud's book (the first one which you discovered was regarding proof of equivalence of Cauchy integrability and Riemann integrability). +1 $\endgroup$ – Paramanand Singh Aug 19 '17 at 5:04
  • $\begingroup$ Btw this is the way one proves that the derivative of $\int_{a} ^{x} f(t) \, dt $ at $c$ is $f(c) $ provided $f$ is continuous at $c$. Most textbooks use mean value theorem to prove this, but then it applies only if $f$ is continuous not just at $c$ but in some neighborhood of $c$. $\endgroup$ – Paramanand Singh Aug 19 '17 at 5:07
  • $\begingroup$ @ParamanandSingh: Thanks. It really is quite a nice book, particularly the historical perspective it provides and the later sections on Lebesgue's FTC. $\endgroup$ – RRL Aug 19 '17 at 5:11
  • $\begingroup$ I have the same opinion about Bressoud's book, but I guess these mistakes were created by the burden of writing a book. Long back I tried to write a book on analysis (not exactly for publishing) but dropped it just after writing 120 pages of $\mathrm \LaTeX $ and the paucity of nice exercises (MSE was yet to born otherwise there would have been no paucity of exercises) $\endgroup$ – Paramanand Singh Aug 19 '17 at 5:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.