I'm taking an intro to Galois theory course, which is rather exciting. We had the following question in a practice paper:

Let $K$ be a field of characteristic $p$, and let $L/K$ be a finite extension with $\left[L:K\right]$ prime to $p$. Show that $L/K$ is separable.

Note that I took "$\left[L:K\right]$ prime to $p$" to mean $p\nmid\left[L:K\right]$.

I managed to reduce the problem to a seemingly simpler one. $L/K$ is separable if and only if $K\left(\alpha\right)$ is separable for all $\alpha\in L$. Also, from the multiplication rule, $p\nmid\left[K\left(\alpha\right):K\right]$. So it's sufficent to prove the proposition for $L=K\left(\alpha\right)$.

I couldn't proceed beyond that. I tried to play a bit with the general form of $\mathrm{irr}\left(\alpha,K\right)$, but that didn't inspire any solution. I had hoped that I might be able to show that $\gcd\left(f,f'\right)=1$, but was unsuccessful. I then tried to understand how an embedding of $L/K$ would "work", but that didn't lead me anywhere either.

I got the sense I'm missing something rather basic. I'm still a newbie when it comes to finite fields and fields with non-zero characteristic. They were mentioned in previous courses I took (say, linear algebra), but we didn't use them as much as fields of zero-characteristic.

I'd love a nudge in the right direction. Thanks!


Let $a\in L$ not in $K$, consider $P$ the minimal polynomial of $a$. Remark that there exists $u_0,...,u_{p-1}\in K$ such that $u_0+u_1a+...+u_{p-1}a^{p-1}+a^p=0$ since $L$ is a $K$-vector space of dimension $P$. Write $Q=u_0+u_1X+...+u_{p-1}X^{p-1}+X^p$, you obtain that $P$ divides $Q$ and $deg(P)\leq p$. You have $[K(a):K]=deg(P)$ and $[L:K]=[L:K(a)][K(a):K]=p$, this implies that $[K(a):K]=p$ since $a$ is not in $K$, you deduce that $P=Q$.

Suppose that the derivative of $P$ is zero, there exists a polynomial $L$ such that $P=L(X^r)$ (see the reference), $deg(P)=rdeg(L)=p$ since $p$ is prime, you deduce that $r=1$. Contradiction.


  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! TBH, I'm not sure I understand your solution. I have a particular problem with the first step, the existence of $u_0 , \dots , u_{p-1}\in K$ etc. How do we know it exists? $\endgroup$ – CrazyGrapher Aug 17 '17 at 21:55
  • $\begingroup$ because $L$ is a $K$-vector space of dimension $p$. $\endgroup$ – Tsemo Aristide Aug 17 '17 at 23:40
  • $\begingroup$ I think I'm still missing something. Both $L$ from the original exercise and $K\left(a\right)$ are of a degree that is not divisible by $p$. So how can we arrive at said linear combination of $\left\{a^k\right\}_{k=0}^p$? $\endgroup$ – CrazyGrapher Aug 18 '17 at 13:10

I'm not sure I fully understand Tsemo's approach, but regardless, I believe I found a different approach. I used proof by contradiction, but I wonder if there is a more direct approach.

As I mentioned in the question, it's sufficient to prove that all $\alpha\in L$ are separable.

Denote $m=\left[K\left(\alpha\right):K\right]$ and $f=\mathrm{irr}\left(\alpha,K\right)$. As explained in the question, $p\nmid m$. Also, $m=\deg\mathrm{irr}\left(\alpha,K\right)$.

Now, assume that $f$ is not separable. That is, $f$ has a multiple root $\beta$. Thus, $f$ and $f'$, the formal derivative of $f$, have a common root, $f\left(\beta\right)=f'\left(\beta\right)=0$. Therefore, $\mathrm{irr}\left(\beta,K \right)\in K\left[X\right]$ divides both $f$ and $f'$.

From this we obtain $\gcd(f,f')\ne 1$ over $K\left[X\right]$. Since $f$ is irreducible, $\gcd(f,f')=f$. This implies $f'=0$, because $\deg f'< \deg f$. Therefore, all the powers of $f$ with non-zero coefficients are divisible by $p$. More formally, there is $g\in K\left[X\right]$ such that $f(X)=g(X^p)$.

But this implies that $p\mid m= \deg f$. Contradiction.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.