1
$\begingroup$

For $G$ a profinite abelian group, do we have $G \cong \varprojlim G/G^n$ (where the limit is taken over all natural numbers ordered by divisibility)? (If it's wrong, is there any nice class of abelian profinite groups for which it holds?)

Here's what I did so far:

It's easy to show that this holds for any group of finite expotent, in particular finite groups. It's also not difficult to see for $\mathbb Z_p$. (From this, the statement follows for topologically finite generated $p$-groups and products thereof, see below)

Since $G/G^n \cong \mathbb Z /(n) \otimes_{\mathbb Z}G$ and $\mathbb Z/(n)$ is a finitely presented module over $\mathbb Z$, the functor $\mathbb Z/(n) \otimes_{\mathbb Z} -$ commutes with arbitrary products, also products commute with projective limits, furthermore any abelian profinite group is a direct products of pro-$p$ groups, thus it would be enough to show this for abelian pro-$p$ groups. Now any abelian pro-$p$ group is a module over $\mathbb Z_p$, thus for any $k$ coprime to $p$, as $k$ is invertible in $\mathbb Z_p$, we have $G^k=G$, from this it follows that for a pro-$p$ group $G$, we may replace the limit by $\varprojlim G/G^{p^n}$, where the limit is taken over all natural numbers with the usual order. If we consider $G$ as a $\mathbb Z$-module, then the above limit is the completion with respect to the ideal $(p)$, thus the question may be reduced to the statement:

Is a pro-$p$ group a $(p)$-adically complete module?

Maybe this formulation of the question allows some kind of topological argument, but I can't seem to relate $(p)$-adic topology and profinite topology.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If $G = \lim_k \mathbb{Z}/2^k \mathbb{Z}$. Won't $\lim_{n \to \infty} G/G^{n}$ contain $\lim_k \mathbb{Z}/3^k \mathbb{Z}$ ? $\endgroup$ – reuns Aug 17 '17 at 12:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @reuns No, in this case $G = \mathbb{Z}_p$ and if $k$ is coprime to $p$, then $G^k=G$, as $k \in \mathbb{Z}_p^{\times}$, thus only powers of $p$ contribute to the limit and the isomorphism follows from the well-known fact that $\mathbb{Z} _p /p^k \mathbb{Z}_p \cong \mathbb{Z}/p^k\mathbb{Z}$ $\endgroup$ – MatheinBoulomenos Aug 17 '17 at 12:21
2
$\begingroup$

Consider the two sets:

  1. the set $A(C)$ of cones with apex $C$ over the diagram of continuous finite quotients of $G$
  2. the set $B(C)$ of cones with apex $C$ over the diagram of quotients of the form $G/G^n$

Elements in $A(C)$ are cones factoring through $G$, and hence extend to map to each quotient $G/G^n$. And in the other direction, we can extend an element of $B(C)$ to a finite quotient $G/H$ using $C\to G/G^{|G/H|}\to G/H$. It is easy to see these maps are mutually inverse and natural in $C$.

But $A$ and $B$ are the hom functors for the limit objects, so by Yoneda's lemma the limits are isomorphic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think that for $A(C)$ you want to take cones over the diagram of continuous finite quotients of $G$, as $G$ is not necessarily the limit of its abstract finite quotients. $\endgroup$ – Jeremy Rickard Aug 18 '17 at 7:36
  • $\begingroup$ @JeremyRickard: good point, I've specified "continuous" now. (And more generally one needs to check that all the maps involved in the proof are continuous, though I think that is not too hard to see.) $\endgroup$ – Dap Aug 19 '17 at 10:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.