1
$\begingroup$

Assume Goldbach's conjecture. Then for any large enough composite integer $ n $ $ r_{0}(n) : =\inf\{r\ge 0,(n-r,n+r)\in\mathbb{P}^{2}\} $ exists and is obviously smaller than $ n $ . Does the assumption of Chowla's conjecture imply that for all $k>0$ one has $\sup_{n\le x}\{r_{0}(n)\}=O(x^{1/k})$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why Chowla's conjecture would be of any help to estimate the distribution of Goldbach's numbers $r_0(n)$ ? I'd say the papers on the weak Goldbach conjecture and Vinogradov's theorem explain under what assumptions we can estimate $r_0(n),\max_{n \le x} r_0(n), \sum_{n \le x} r_0(n)$. $\endgroup$ – reuns Aug 14 '17 at 13:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.