A sequence of $R$-modules of the form $$0 \to M_1 \stackrel{f}{\to} M \stackrel{g}{\to} M_2 \to 0$$ is called a short exact sequence (ses) if $f$ is injective, $g$ is surjective and $\operatorname{Im} f = \operatorname{Ker} g$.

A short exact sequence is said to split if there exist a $R$-homomorphism $h: M_2 \to M$ such that $g\circ h = \operatorname{Id}_{M_2}$.

It is well known that if a short exact sequence split then $M \cong M_1 \oplus M_2$.

What I am interested in is the converse. I know that the converse is not true. That is, there exist a short exact sequence with $M \cong M_1 \oplus M_2$ which does not split. I wish to construct such a counter example.

Consider $R=\mathbb{Z}$, $M_1=\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ and $M'=\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$. Suppose we have a $\mathbb{Z}$-module $N$ such that $M_1\oplus N \cong N$ and $M' \oplus N \cong N$. Define $M= M'\oplus N$, and $M_2=M_1\oplus N$. Then $$M_1\oplus M_2 \cong M_1 \oplus N \cong N \cong M' \oplus N = M$$ Then consider the sequence $$0 \to M_1 \stackrel{f}{\to} M \stackrel{g}{\to} M_2 \to 0$$ where $f:M_1\to M=M''\oplus N$ is defined as $f(\bar{1})=(\bar{2},0)$ and $g: M \to M_2$ as $g(\bar{x},n)=(\bar{x},n)$. Then clearly $f$ is injective and $g$ is surjective and $\operatorname{Im} f = \operatorname{Ker} g$.

Suppose the ses splits. Then $h :M_2 \to M$ is such that $g\circ h =\operatorname{Id}_{M_2}$. But then $$h(\bar{1},0) \in g^{-1}(\bar{1},0)=\{\bar{1},0),(\bar{3},0)\}$$ But $2(\bar{1},0)=(\bar{2},0)$ and $2(\bar{3},0)=(\bar{2},0)$ in $M$. Thus $$h(\bar{0},0)=2h(\bar{1},0)=(\bar{2},0)$$ which contradicts the fact that $h$ is a homomorphism. Thus the ses does not splits.

The only thing that remains to show the existence of such an $N$. However, I am no able to show that such an $N$ does exists. Any help/ suggestions.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ See math.stackexchange.com/questions/135444/… $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Aug 9 '17 at 2:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please always search the site. We have had maaaaaaaany questions already, and there is always a good chance that one's question has already been asked. $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Aug 9 '17 at 2:55
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @MarianoSuárez-Álvarez . I did search with keywords "short exact sequence" and "split". But it is always difficult to search latex things like $M=M_1\oplus M_2$. $\endgroup$ – Sayan Aug 9 '17 at 2:57
  • $\begingroup$ Use Google to search. I searched for exactly the same terms, and with typos and all. $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Aug 9 '17 at 3:36

Let $N$ be a direct sum of infinitely many copies of $M_1$ and infinitely many copies of $M'$. Since adding one element to an infinite set doesn't change its cardinality, $M_1\oplus N\cong N$ and $M'\oplus N\cong N$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.