1
$\begingroup$

Calculate the area of the walls of the solid given by $x^2+y^2=1$, $z=0$ and $z=1+xy$. The walls mean the area between $z=0$, and $z=1+xy$.

I know that I can solve this problem by calculating the area of the surface by treating the walls as a toilet paper, unfold the toilet paper on a flat surface, and do a double integral over the toilet paper with the function$f(x,y)$ inside of the double inegral set to 1.

$\int _0^{2\pi}\:\int _0^{1+cos\left(\theta \right)\cdot \:sin\left(\theta \right)}\:1\:dz\:d\theta$

For this problem though I am more interested in using the formula given by:

$\int \:\int _A\left|\frac{\partial r}{\partial u}\times\frac{\partial r}{\partial v}\left(u,v\right)\:\right|du\:dv$

And I am unsure of the parametrization of this problem and then what the jacobian-determinant becomes.

I think the correct parametrization is:

$r\left(\theta ,z\right)=cos\left(\theta \right)i+sin\left(\theta \right)j+\left(z\right)k\:$

Choosing $r(\theta,z)$ as above $\left|\frac{\partial \:r}{\partial \:u}\times \frac{\partial \:r}{\partial \:v}\left(u,v\right)\:\right|$ becomes 1. I generally have a problem with these things when the functions aren't given on the form $z=..$

But then, the question becomes, if that is the correct parametrization, what is the jacobian-determinant?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Everything you say is correct. You have the parametrization $${\bf r}(\theta,z)=(\cos\theta,\sin\theta,z)\ ,\tag{1}$$ giving $$|{\bf r}_\theta\times{\bf r}_z|\equiv1\ ,$$ hence the surface element on $S$ is given by ${\rm d}\omega={\rm d}(\theta,z)$. There is no Jacobian determinant here, but a scaling factor from the measure ${\rm d}(\theta,z)$ in the parameter plane to the surface measure ${\rm d}\omega$ in $3$-space. This scaling factor happens to be $1$ in the case at hand. You end up with the integral of your first attempt, obtained using "geometric intuition". Given the parametrization $(1)$ the condition $0\leq z\leq 1+x y$ translates into $0\leq z\leq1+\cos\theta\sin\theta$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ But why is there no jacobian determinant? If you parametrize with $x=r cos(\theta)$, and $y=rsin(\theta)$, the jacobian determinant will be $r$ for example.I can't calculate the determinant because the jacobian matrix won't be 2x2, or 3x3 (If I am doing it correctly). I tried making it a 3x3 matrix filling in all the blanks with 0, and then the determinant ended up being 0? Maybe that is correct. $\endgroup$ – David Lund Aug 1 '17 at 16:46
  • $\begingroup$ Do you think you could give me an example where the scaling factor isn't 1? Or point me to some article explaining this maybe. $\endgroup$ – David Lund Aug 1 '17 at 19:46
  • $\begingroup$ The scaling factor is $|{\bf r}_{.1}\times{\bf r}_{.2}|$, as you knew all along. For a representation of the unit sphere (with $\theta=0$ on the equator) you obtain $|{\bf r}_\phi\times{\bf r}_\theta|=\cos\theta$. – The Jacobian determinant is the scaling factor between volume measures for maps $f:\>{\mathbb R}^n\to{\mathbb R}^n$. $\endgroup$ – Christian Blatter Aug 2 '17 at 7:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.