0
$\begingroup$

$f$ is holomorphic function on open unit disk $B(O,1)$. There exists a positive number $r$ such that $f$ is univalent on the annulus $r<|z|<1$. Is it sufficient to conclude $f$ to be univalent on $B(O,1)$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If it is not univalent in the hole of the annulus, the image (by the function minus a value it takes more than once) of a loop in the annulus would have to wind more than once around the origin without intersecting itself. $\endgroup$ – Peyton Jul 30 '17 at 13:01
2
$\begingroup$

Please keep in mind that what follows is basically an expansion of the remark provided by Peyton.

Suppose that $f|_{B(0,r)}$ is not injective. Then, for some $a\in\mathbb C$, the equation $f(z)=a$ has two distinct solutions in $B(0,r)$. Now, let $\gamma\colon[0,2\pi]\longrightarrow\mathbb C$ be the loop defined by $\gamma(t)=r'e^{it}$, for some $r'\in(r,1)$ chosen such that the equation $f(z)=a$ has no roots with absolute value equal to $r'$. Then, by the argument principle and since $f$ has no poles, $\frac1{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)-a}\mathrm dz$ is a natural number greater than $1$. On the other hand, if $\Gamma=f\circ\gamma$, then$$\frac1{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)-a}\mathrm dz=\frac1{2\pi i}\int_\Gamma\frac{\mathrm dz}{z-a}=\operatorname{Ind}_\Gamma(a).$$So, the winding number of $\Gamma$ with respect to $a$ is greater than $2$. So, $\Gamma$ loops around $a$ twice (at least). But then it must intersect itself, and therefore the restriction of $f$ to the image of $\gamma$ cannot be injective.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.