In my personal study of interesting sums, I came up with the following sum that I could not evaluate:

$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\log n}{n!} = 0.60378\dots$$

I would be very interested to see what can be done to this sum. Does a closed form of this fascinating sum exist?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Fascinating?${}$ $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Nov 14 '12 at 22:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @GerryMyerson Very fascinating! :) $\endgroup$ – Argon Nov 14 '12 at 22:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In what way?${}$ $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Nov 14 '12 at 22:47
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @GerryMyerson I don't know. Just when I see an elegant looking infinite sum, I find it very fascinating. $\endgroup$ – Argon Nov 14 '12 at 22:48

Using Dobinski's formula for Bell numbers, we have $$B(n)=\frac{1}{e}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{k^n}{k!}$$ Hence, $$\frac{d}{dn}B(n)=\frac{1}{e}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{k^n\log k}{k!}$$ whence, $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\log k}{k!}=B'_0 e$$ Note that the first term ($k=1$) is $0$.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @did change $n$ to $x$. It will be ok $\endgroup$ – Norbert Nov 14 '12 at 22:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @did I plot the garph of $B(n)$ with $n\in\mathbb{R}_+$. It is ok. $\endgroup$ – Norbert Nov 14 '12 at 23:25
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Now, what use is such a formula? $\endgroup$ – fedja Nov 15 '12 at 1:14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I absolutely agree that if Bell numbers are viewed strictly as a sequence of integers - a function $B:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$ - then my answer has no meaning at all. The derivative is just not defined, you are right. So the question is really: Is it meaningful to extend Bell numbers' definition for non-integer values? This falls into the category of opinions, but I think yes. And we have a well defined way of doing it with Dobinski's formula. $\endgroup$ – Spenser Nov 16 '12 at 22:15
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ With that said, isn't it just pretty to notice that this "fascinating sum" is precisely $e$ times the slope at the origin of the natural extension of Bell numbers? I think it is, that's all. Why? Because it links two apparently unrelated concepts together. Is it "useful"? "meaningful"? For the development of mathematics, I don't know. But at least, it is useful for the people who look at it and find it somewhat interesting or just pretty. $\endgroup$ – Spenser Nov 16 '12 at 22:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.