4
$\begingroup$

I would like to negate the following:

$\exists x, \forall y, \forall z ((F(x,y) \land G(x,z)) \rightarrow H(y,z))$

Would the following proposed solution be correct?

(1) First simplify what is in the brackets - $((F(x,y) \land G(x,z)) \rightarrow H(y,z))$

$(\lnot(F(x,y) \land G(x,z)) \lor H(y,z))$

(2) $\forall x, \exists y, \exists z \lnot ( \lnot(F(x,y) \land G(x,z)) \lor H(y,z)) $

$\equiv \forall x, \exists y, \exists z((F(x,y) \land G(x,z)) \land \lnot H(y,z))$

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, though you’ve done a little more work than necessary. If you remember that $\lnot(\varphi\to\psi)$ is $\varphi\land\lnot\psi$, you can go directly to $$\forall x\exists y\exists z\Big(F(x,y)\land G(x,z)\land\lnot H(y,z)\Big)\;.$$ $\endgroup$ Nov 14 '12 at 21:36
  • $\begingroup$ cheers @BrianM.Scott $\endgroup$
    – bosra
    Nov 14 '12 at 21:39
2
$\begingroup$

The negation of $P \Rightarrow Q$ is $$\neg(P \Rightarrow Q) \equiv (P \wedge \neg Q)$$ and the negation of "for all" is $$\neg (\forall x)(P(x)) \equiv (\exists x)(\neg P(x)).$$ Similarly, $$\neg (\exists x)(P(x)) \equiv (\forall x)(\neg P(x))$$ so your answer is correct.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.