0
$\begingroup$

The metric on sphere $\mathbb{S}^2$ with radius $r$ is given by $$ g = r^2 \, d\varphi \otimes d\varphi + r^2 \sin^2 \varphi \, d\theta \otimes d\theta$$ in the spherical coordinates. Let $N$ be the north pole and consider a tangent vector $\dfrac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \in T_N \mathbb{S}^2$. Then its length is \begin{align*} \left \Vert \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \right \Vert^2 = \left\langle \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \right\rangle = r^2 \sin^2 \varphi. \end{align*} Since $\varphi = 0$ on the north pole, I get $\left \Vert \dfrac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \right\Vert = 0$. I think I went wrong somewhere but I couldn't find any mistake. Would you please check if it is right? Thank you.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $\mathbb{S}^{n-1}$ should just be $\mathbb{S}^2$ in this question. $\endgroup$ – Lee Mosher Jul 26 '17 at 13:40
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. I edited it. $\endgroup$ – Minhyun Kim Jul 27 '17 at 4:06
3
$\begingroup$

Your calculation is correct. It shows that the parametrisation $(\sin{\varphi}\cos{\theta},\sin{\varphi}\sin{\theta},\cos{\theta})$ is not a regular parametrisation of the unit sphere, since the tangent vectors are not everywhere linearly independent. (By the way, it is more standard to have $\theta$ as the colatitude and $\varphi$ as the longitudinal angle.) It is a regular parametrisation of the region of the sphere where $0<\theta<\pi$. (You can also see that problems occur with $\partial/\partial\varphi$ at the pole: which direction does it point in? Symmetry implies it can't point in any direction!)

In fact, there is no regular parametrisation of the whole of the sphere: this is a consequence of the hairy ball theorem.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.