Eigenvalues of differential operator L(second order differential equation) I'm looking for eigenvalues of operator L such as:
$$ L=\frac{d^2}{dt^2} + \Gamma \frac{d}{dt} $$
I know that I need to solve equation:
$$ f''(t) + \Gamma f'(t) = \lambda f(t) $$
But I have no idea even where to start.
Edit 1: $\Gamma$ is a constant, not a function of $t$ and $\Gamma > 0$. 

Edit 2: I tried to solve a differential equation which I wrote. I got something like this:
$$ f(t) = C_1 e^{-\frac{\Gamma t}{2}} + C_2 t e^{-\frac{\Gamma t}{2}} $$
for
$$ \lambda = - \frac{1}{4} \Gamma^2 $$
Is this lambda my eigenvalue?
But this is solution for $\Delta=0$ of a characteristic equation. What about other values of delta?
As far as I know $\Gamma > 0$
 A: Let
$f = e^{\mu t}; \tag{1}$
then
$f' = \mu e^{\mu t}, \tag{2}$
and
$f'' = \mu^2 e^{\mu t}; \tag{3}$
thus,
$f'' + \Gamma f' = \mu^2 e^{\mu t} + \Gamma \mu e^{\mu t} = \lambda e^{\mu t}; \tag{4}$
since there is no $t$ such that $e^{\mu t} = 0$, we may cancel it out, yielding
$\mu^2 + \Gamma \mu = \lambda; \tag{5}$
we complete the square:
$(\mu  + \dfrac{\Gamma}{2})^2 = \mu^2 + \Gamma \mu + \dfrac{\Gamma^2}{4} = \lambda + \dfrac{\Gamma^2}{4}; \tag{6}$
hence,
$\mu  + \dfrac{\Gamma}{2} = \pm \sqrt{\lambda + \dfrac{\Gamma^2}{4}}; \tag{7}$
$\mu = -\dfrac{\Gamma}{2} \pm \sqrt{\lambda + \dfrac{\Gamma^2}{4}}; \tag{8}$
(1)-(8) show that for every $\lambda \in \Bbb C$ there is at least one and at most two $\mu \in \Bbb C$ such that $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of 
$\dfrac{d}{dt^2} + \Gamma \dfrac{d}{dt} \tag{9}$
with eigenfunction $e^{\mu t}$.
The sign of $\Gamma$ doesn't affect this result.
Note Added Thursday 20 July 2017 5:55 PM PST:  In answer to OP user464980's question, posted in the comment stream to this answer, I must confess I chose $e^{\mu t}$ as a sample eigenfunction because I knew, after many years of experience, that it would work.  But there are good theoretical reasons as well; one is that, letting $D_t = d/dt$. any constant-coefficient linear operator $\sum a_i D_t^i$ will simply have the effect of multiplying an exponential function by a polynomial:  we have $D_t e^{\mu t} = \mu e^{\mu }$, $D_t^2 e^{\mu t} = \mu^2 e^{\mu t}$, and so forth, $D_t^n e^{\mu t} = \mu^n e^{\mu t}$, leading to
$(\sum a_i D_t^i) e^{\mu  t}= (\sum a_i \mu^i)e^{\mu t}; \tag{10}$
so I knew that the operator (9) would convert a calculus/analysis problem into an algebraic one which I knew how to solve.  Another theoretical reason is that ODEs (once boundary/initial conditions are supplied), have unique solutions.  So I knew that $e^{\mu t}$ was really the only choice.  End of Note.
