I'm attempting to understand how the following sum behaves for different values of $p$ and $q$: $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty \frac{1}{ k^q (\ln k)^p} $$I think I have figured out every case, except when $q \in (0,1)$ and $p>1. $ To determine what to do, I gave concrete values to $p$ and $q$. Namely, $q=\frac{1}{2}$, and $p=2$. But I still can't figure out how to prove the behavior of the series. Using Wolfram Alpha, I know that the series below diverges, but I don't know how to prove it. Does anyone have any insight to showing either the general case above or the more concrete case below? Thanks in advance.

$$\sum_{k=2}^\infty \frac{1}{\sqrt k (\ln k)^2} $$

  • $\begingroup$ Can you apply the integral test? $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Jul 20 '17 at 20:19
  • $\begingroup$ I tried, but my if I set $u = \ln k$, and $du=1/k$, it doesn't quite work properly. Perhaps a different integration strategy would be better? $\endgroup$ – BSplitter Jul 20 '17 at 20:22
  • $\begingroup$ That should be the correct approach. Could you show what you get after the substitution? $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Jul 20 '17 at 20:25
  • $\begingroup$ Are you referring to the general case or the specific one? $\endgroup$ – BSplitter Jul 20 '17 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ Either is fine. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Jul 20 '17 at 20:27


Actually, $\ln k$ grows slower than any positive power of $k$: for any $\alpha>0$ there is an $n$ such that

$$k>n\implies\ln k<k^\alpha$$

as, taking the derivative, $k^{-1}$ grows slower than $k^{\alpha-1}$.

Then you can replace $q$ by $q+\alpha<1$ and drop the $\ln$ factor, and the resulting series is bounded below by the harmonic one.

More about this:

In a way, $\ln k=k^0$. Indeed,

$$\ln k=\lim_{\alpha\to0}\frac{k^\alpha-1}\alpha.$$


For the general case, use the integral test for series. Observe that $$\sum \frac{1}{k^p\ln(k)^q} \approx \int_1^{\infty}\frac{dx}{x^p\ln(x)^q} = \int_0^{\infty}\frac{e^{-(p-1)u}}{u^q}du$$ It should be easier to deduce what values of $p$ and $q$ lead to convergence.

  • $\begingroup$ I believe the exponents on this are flipped. Does that change the assessment at all? $\endgroup$ – BSplitter Jul 20 '17 at 20:35
  • $\begingroup$ I switched the indices on accident but the analysis should be the same $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Davidson Jul 20 '17 at 20:38
  • $\begingroup$ How would I consider integrating the last integral, with arbitrary powers? Integration by parts seems like the only option, but it looks awful. $\endgroup$ – BSplitter Jul 20 '17 at 20:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The integration by parts doesn't look to bad. If you need help with seemingly long integration by parts problems, look up the DI method on youtube, particularly on blackpenredpen's channel $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Davidson Jul 20 '17 at 20:50
  • $\begingroup$ @BlakeSplitter ask yourself if the integrand approaches zero when $p <1$. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Jul 20 '17 at 21:48

You can prove the following: $\left(\ln k\right)^2 < \sqrt[3]{k}$ for large enough $k \ge 2$. And this amounts to: $\ln k < k^{\frac{1}{6}}$. The ratio $\dfrac{k^{1/6}}{\ln k} \to +\infty$ as $k \to \infty$. Thus starting at $k_0$ on ward, $k^{1/6} > \ln k \implies \ln k - k^{1/6} < 0, k \ge k_0$.


From Cauchy's Condensation Test, the series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}\log^2(n)}$ is convergent if anf only if the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{2^{n/2}}{n^2\log^2(2)}$ converges. Since the latter series diverges (the general terms do not approach $0$), the series of interest diverges likewise.


The key fact is that $\dfrac{\ln x}{x^c} \to 0 $ as $x \to \infty$ for any $c > 0$.

So show this, start with $\dfrac{\ln x}{x} \to 0 $ as $x \to \infty$. Then $\dfrac{\ln x^c}{x^c} \to 0 $ as $x \to \infty$. But $\dfrac{\ln x^c}{x^c} =\dfrac{c\ln x}{x^c} \to 0 $.

Here is an easy way to show that $\dfrac{\ln x}{x} \to 0 $.

$\ln(x) =\int_1^x \dfrac{dt}{t} \le\int_1^x \dfrac{dt}{t^{1/2}} =\dfrac{x^{1/2}-1}{1/2} \lt 2x^{1/2} $ so $\dfrac{\ln(x)}{x} \le \dfrac{2}{x^{1/2}} \to 0 $.

You can also show it directly by a modification of this last proof.

For any $c > d > 0$ and $x > 1$,

$\begin{array}\\ \ln(x) &=\int_1^x \dfrac{dt}{t}\\ &\lt\int_1^x \dfrac{dt}{t^{1-d}} \qquad\text{since } t > t^{1-d}\\ &=\dfrac{x^{d}-1}{d}\\ &<\dfrac{x^{d}-1}{d}\\ \text{so}\\ \dfrac{\ln(x)}{x^c} &\le \dfrac{x^{d-c}}{d}\\ &= \dfrac{1}{dx^{c-d}}\\ &\to 0\\ \end{array} $


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.