Let $\omega\in\Omega^1(\mathbb{R^2})$ be a 1-form such that $d\omega=dx\wedge dy$. Let $i:S^1\to \mathbb{R^2}$ be the inclusion and $S^1$ be the unit circle. I want to compute $\displaystyle\int_{S^1}i^*\omega$. By Stoke's we have that $$\displaystyle\int_{S^1}i^*\omega=\int_{B}d\omega\,\,\,\,\,,B\text{ is the unit disc}.$$

We can parametrize $B$ by $Y(r,\theta)=(r\cos\theta,r\sin\theta)$ where $0\leq r\leq1,$ $0\leq\theta\leq 2\pi.$ Now, I need to check if this parametrization is coherent with the orientation on $B$. I am not sure how to do this and would like some help on that. Assuming this is coherent, $$\int_B d\omega=\int_0^1 \int_0^{2\pi}\begin{vmatrix} \cos\theta & -r\sin\theta \\ \sin\theta & r\cos\theta \end{vmatrix}drd\theta=2\pi$$. Is this correct?

  • $\begingroup$ The area of the unit disk in $\Bbb R^2$ is $\pi$. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Jul 22 '17 at 0:38

To check that the orientation induced by this parameterization is consistent with the orientation on $B$ it suffices to show that the determinant of the Jacobian of the transition matrix between these two charts is positive, which you already did!

I think there is a small mistake in your computation though since the $d\omega$ is the usual volume form on $\mathbb{R}^2$, and hence on $B$. So the integral should be the area of the circle, which is $\pi$. You have the limits of your integrals switched ($r$ doesn't go from $0$ to $2\pi$, $\theta$ does!), what you should have is $$\int_{B}d\omega=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{1}\begin{vmatrix} \cos\theta & -r\sin\theta \\ \sin\theta & r\cos\theta \end{vmatrix}dr~d\theta=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\frac{1}{2}~d\theta=\pi.$$

  • $\begingroup$ Determinant of the Jacobian being the one inside the integral? $\endgroup$ – Heisenberg Jul 19 '17 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. Your map $Y:[0,1]\times[0,2\pi)\to B$ is the transition function between the polar coordinates chart and the usual Euclidean coordinates chart on $B$. $\endgroup$ – yousuf soliman Jul 19 '17 at 18:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is a slight issue in that $Y$ is not smooth at $r=0$, but this doesn't matter since integrating over $B\setminus\{0\}$ is the same as integrating over $B$ since $\{0\}$ has Lebesgue measure zero. In some sense, it would have been better to write $\int_{B}d\omega = \int_{B}dxdy$, and then use the usual change of variables for the Lebesgue integral to argue that this is the correct result. $\endgroup$ – yousuf soliman Jul 19 '17 at 19:01
  • $\begingroup$ Why don't you need to consider a outward pointing normal vector/ $\endgroup$ – Heisenberg Jul 19 '17 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure why I would need to? What is your definition of orientation? The definition I'm using can be found here: map.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/… . Then we can consider $B$ as a smooth manifold with two charts: (1) the Euclidean coordinates chart $\mathrm{id}:B\to B$ and (2) the polar coordinates chart $Y:(0,1]\times[0,2\pi)\to B\setminus\{0\}$. Then we see that these charts form an orientation on $B$ since the determinant of the Jacobian of the transition function is positive. $\endgroup$ – yousuf soliman Jul 19 '17 at 19:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.