0
$\begingroup$

Consider the following subset $X \subset \mathbb{R^2}$ with the Euclidian subspace topology.

$\begin{multline} X=\{(0,y): y \in [-1,1]\} \cup \\ \{(x,y): x\in (0,1) , y \in \mathbb{Q} \cap[-1,1]\}\\ \cup \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R^2}: x \in (-1,0), y \in (\mathbb{R \setminus Q)} \cap[-1,1]\}\text{.}\end{multline}$

(i) Is $X$ connected?

(ii) Find closure and interior of $X$

I tried to visualize the open sets in the subspace topology. They are intersections of "euclidian balls" with the set $X$. I think that the following set is not connected because if I call $A=\{(0,y): y \in [-1,1]\} \cup \{0\}\times [-1,1]$ and $B=\{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R^2}: x \in (-1,0), y \in (\mathbb{R \setminus Q)} \cap[-1,1]\}$ then I have, just from the definition of $X$:

$A \cup B= X$

$A \cap B=\emptyset$.

I think that $A$ and $B$ are open sets because they are the intersection of $X$ with a "Euclidian rectangle"...

Since $X$ is open, then $\operatorname{Int}(X)=\emptyset$ and $\operatorname{Cl}(X)=X$, but I'm not so sure of this.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ One should always have $\operatorname{Int}(X) \subseteq X \subseteq \operatorname{Cl}(X)$. Maybe your confusing interiors and closures? $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Jul 16 '17 at 23:30
  • $\begingroup$ thanks, I edit. I was copying from the paper $\endgroup$ – VoB Jul 16 '17 at 23:40
  • $\begingroup$ I cannot make grammatical sense of your def'n of A. In any case X is path-connected (and hence connected) because when (x,y) , (x',y') are in A , we can travel ( within X ) horizontally from (x,y) to (x,0) and vertically from (x,0) to (x',0) and horizontally from (x',0) to (x',y'). $\endgroup$ – DanielWainfleet Jul 20 '17 at 2:00
1
$\begingroup$

The space $X$ is arcwise connected, hence also connected. It's interior is empty, because $X$ doesn't contains open balls. On the other hand it's closure is the square $[-1,1]\times[-1,1]$, by the density of rational numbers in the set of real numbers.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ... and by the density of the irrationals in the reals $\endgroup$ – timon92 Jul 16 '17 at 22:04
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for the answer! I can't understand how you can say that $X$ doesn't contain open balls... And for the closure: how can I say that $[-1,1]\times[-1,1]$ is a closed set? Just because I got the subspace Euclidian topology ? $\endgroup$ – VoB Jul 16 '17 at 22:07
  • $\begingroup$ Note that open balls are convex subsets of the plane while $X$ doesn't contain vertical segments other than those contained in $\{0\}\times[-1,1]$; thus $X$ cannot contains open balls. $\endgroup$ – Fabio Lucchini Jul 16 '17 at 22:13
  • $\begingroup$ Recall that $[-1,1]$ is a closed subset of the real line, hence $[-1,1]\times[-1,1]$ is a closed subset of the plane. $\endgroup$ – Fabio Lucchini Jul 16 '17 at 22:14
  • $\begingroup$ Just a question: by the definition of $X$ the text gave me, I considered, for example ${(x,y):x∈(0,1),y∈ℚ∩[−1,1]}$ as a cartesian product. Is it right? Maybe I misunderstood the text. $\endgroup$ – VoB Jul 16 '17 at 22:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.