# A right angle at the focus of a hyperbola

$P$ is a point on a hyperbola. The tangent at $P$ cuts a directrix at point $Q$.
Prove that $PQ$ subtends a right angle to the focus $F$ corresponding to the directrix.

I have tried to use the general equation of the hyperbola and gradient method to show, but too many unknowns and I can't continue. I tried to show $m_1 m_2 = -1$, but I stuck halfway.

Note (From @Blue). This property holds for all conics, except circles, which have no directrix. For ellipses and hyperbolas, the property holds for either focus-directrix pair. A proof incorporating this level of generality would be nice to see.

We can restate the property in a way that includes the circle as a limiting case:

$P$ is a point on a conic with focus $F$. The line perpendicular to $\overline{PF}$ at $F$ meets the tangent at $P$ in a point on the directrix corresponding to $F$; if $P$ is a vertex, then the perpendicular, tangent, and directrix are parallel, meeting at a point "at infinity". In the case of a circle, the perpendicular is parallel to the tangent (so that they "meet" in a point on a "directrix at infinity").

• There are some pole-polar relationships among these points and lines that seem like they might be useful. The focus $F$ and directrix are a pole-polar pair, of course, as are $P$ and the tangent line there, but also $Q$ is the pole of $\overline{PF}$ and the pole of $\overline{QF}$ is the intersection of $\overline{PF}$ with the directrix.
– amd
Jul 18, 2017 at 18:52
• Since this appears to be a universal property of all (non-degenerate?) conics, it seems like there ought to be a projective-geometric proof.
– amd
Jul 18, 2017 at 18:54

This is an euclidean solution to the parabolic case.
To adapt the proof to the hyperbolic case is left to the reader.

Lemma 1 (how to draw a tangent to a parabola). Let $A$ the projection of $P$ on the axis of the parabola and $B$ the symmetric of $A$ with respect to $V$. Then $PB$ is the tangent to the parabola at $P$.

In modern terms, this is just $\frac{d}{dx}x^2 = 2x$.

Lemma 2 (optical property of the parabola). If $C$ is the projection of $P$ on the directrix, the tangent at $P$ bisects the angle $\widehat{FPC}$.

Proof: Let $O$ be the intersection between the axis and the directrix. By Lemma 1 we have $PAF=COB$, so $PFBC$ is a parallelogram. Since $PF=PC$ by the definition of parabola, $PFBC$ is indeed a rhombus.

Corollary. Since $PF=PC$ and $PQ$ bisects $\widehat{FPC}$, $C$ and $F$ are symmetric with respect to $PQ$. It follows that $$\widehat{PFQ}=\widehat{PCQ}$$ so $\widehat{PFQ}$ is a right angle.

In the hyperbolic/elliptic case Lemma 2 and the next Corollary have to be replaced with: the tangent at $P$ is the internal/external angle bisector of $\widehat{F_1 P F_2}$, hence $PCQF$ is a cyclic quadrilateral and $\widehat{PFQ}=\widehat{PCQ}$ holds.

• The question was originally about a hyperbola before it was edited to be about a parabola. That said, it appears that the property is valid for any conic (with an appropriate interpretation of the property for the case of a circle, which has no directrix).
– Blue
Jul 16, 2017 at 4:14
• @Blue: what is the definition of directrix for a hyperbola? Jul 16, 2017 at 4:16
• Oh, I see (mathworld.wolfram.com/ConicSectionDirectrix.html). I guess the above proof can be extended to the elliptic and hyperbolic case, too (both the ellipse and the hyperbola have similar optical properties). Jul 16, 2017 at 4:18
• @Blue: I was not (except that for the parabola, of course). There's always something to learn! Jul 16, 2017 at 4:19
• @Anonymous: www.geogebra.org Jul 16, 2017 at 7:47

Here is a solution for parabola. You can use the similar way for hyperbola.

Let $y^2=2px$ be an equation of our parabola, $P(x_1,y_1)$.

Hence, $F\left(\frac{p}{2},0\right)$ and $x=-\frac{p}{2}$ is an equation of the directrix.

If $x_1=\frac{p}{2}$ then since $yy_1=p(x+x_1)$ is an equation of the tangent,

$Q\left(-\frac{p}{2},0\right)$ and $\measuredangle QFP=90^{\circ}$.

Let $x_1\neq\frac{p}{2}$.

Hence, we can calculate slopes: $$m_{PF}=\frac{y_1}{x_1-\frac{p}{2}}.$$

$x_Q=-\frac{p}{2}$.

Thus, $yy_Q=p\left(-\frac{p}{2}+x_1\right)$, which gives $Q\left(-\frac{p}{2},\frac{p\left(x_1-\frac{p}{2}\right)}{y_1}\right)$ and $$m_{FQ}=\frac{\frac{p\left(x_1-\frac{p}{2}\right)}{y_1}-0}{-\frac{p}{2}-\frac{p}{2}}=\frac{\frac{p}{2}-x_1}{y_1}$$ and since $$m_{PF}\cdot m_{FQ}=\frac{y_1}{x_1-\frac{p}{2}}\cdot\frac{\frac{p}{2}-x_1}{y_1}=-1,$$ we are done!

For hyperbola we obtain:

Let $\frac{x^2}{a^2}-\frac{y^2}{b^2}=1$ be an equation of our hyperbola, $P(x_1,y_1)$.

Hence, $F\left(\sqrt{a^2+b^2},0\right)$ and $x=\frac{a^2}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}$ is an equation of the directrix.

If $x_1=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}$ then since $\frac{xx_1}{a^2}-\frac{yy_1}{b^2}=1$ is an equation of the tangent,

$Q\left(\frac{a^2}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}},0\right)$ and $\measuredangle QFP=90^{\circ}$.

Let $x_1\neq\sqrt{a^2+b^2}$.

Hence, we can calculate slopes: $$m_{PF}=\frac{y_1}{x_1-\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}.$$

$x_Q=\frac{a^2}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}$.

Thus, $\frac{a^2}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}\cdot\frac{x_1}{a^2}-\frac{y_Qy_1}{b^2}=1$, which gives $Q\left(\frac{a^2}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}},\frac{b^2}{y_1}\left(\frac{x_1}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}-1\right)\right)$ and $$m_{FQ}=\frac{\frac{b^2}{y_1}\left(\frac{x_1}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}-1\right)-0}{\frac{a^2}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}-\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}=\frac{\frac{b^2}{y_1}\left(x_1-\sqrt{a^2+b^2}\right)}{a^2-(a^2+b^2)}=\frac{x_1-\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}{-y_1}$$ and since $$m_{PF}\cdot m_{FQ}=-1,$$ we are done!

• Sorry Micheal for the time stolen, due to my ignorance I thought OP's question was actually about a parabola, but I was wrong. Jul 16, 2017 at 4:30
• @Jack D'Aurizio All correct! Jul 16, 2017 at 4:38
• but for hyperbola it PQ subtends to focus, for parabola is PF subtends to Q Jul 16, 2017 at 5:18
• @Johnny Teh If you wish I can write the proof. Jul 16, 2017 at 5:20
• @micheal Rozenberg i have tried long time. im using the focus(ae) and the directrix(a/e) but i still stuck halfway. Thank you very much if u wish to help me. Jul 16, 2017 at 5:30

Here's an analytic solution for the general case, using the alternate formulation in my edit to the original question. (We'll ignore the obvious case of circles, which have eccentricity $0$.)

Recall that the focus-directrix definition of a conic with eccentricity $e \neq 0$ is the locus of points such that $$\text{distance from focus} = \text{eccentricity} \cdot \text{(distance from directrix)} \tag{1}$$

Taking a focus $F$ at the origin, and corresponding directrix at $x=-d$, we can square $(1)$ to get this equation for the locus: $$x^2 + y^2 = e^2 ( x + d )^2 \tag{2}$$

Let $P=(p,q)$, with $q\neq0$, be a (non-vertex) point on the conic. If you "know" that the equation for the tangent at $P$ is $$x p + y q = e^2 ( x + d ) ( p + d ) \tag{3}$$ (see @amd's comment below) then we're practically done. After all, the line perpendicular to $\overline{PF}$ at $F$ is $$x p + y q = 0 \tag{4}$$ which matches the left-hand side of $(3)$. Consequently, the intersection of these two lines must have $x=-d$ (to simultaneously zero-out the right-hand side of $(3)$). That is, the point of intersection lies on the directrix, which completes the proof. $\square$

A less-insightful approach might note that the perpendicular $(4)$ meets the directrix at $$Q = \frac{d}{q} \left( -q, p \right) \tag{5}$$ Then, $\overleftrightarrow{PQ}$ has this equation $$x ( q^2 - d p ) - q y ( p+d ) = - d ( p^2 + q^2 ) \tag{6}$$ Since $P$ satisfies $(2)$, we can rewrite $(5)$ by replacing occurrences of $q^2$ with $e^2(p+d)^2-p^2$. Dividing-through by $p+d$ gives $$x ( e^2(p+d) - p ) - q y = - d e^2 ( p+d ) \quad\to\quad x p + y q = e^2(x+d)(p+d) \tag{7}$$

Not recognizing $(7)$ as the equation of the tangent line, one may substitute $y$ from $(7)$ into $(2)$ to get an equation for the $x$-coordinate(s) of the point(s) of intersection; since that equation reduces to $$(x-p)^2 = 0 \tag{8}$$ we see that the points of intersection coincide; that is, $\overleftrightarrow{PQ}$ is indeed tangent to the conic at $P$. $\square$

• I’m sure that you know this already, but if you write the conic equation as $\mathbf x^TC\mathbf x=0$, then the equation of the tangent at $\mathbf p$ is $\mathbf x^TC\mathbf p=0$. That gives you eqn. (3) almost directly.
– amd
Jul 17, 2017 at 2:31
• @amd: Yes, good point.
– Blue
Jul 17, 2017 at 2:51

Consider the hyperbola $\hspace{3cm}\quad\dfrac {x^2}{a^2}-\dfrac {y^2}{b^2}=1$

which has directrix $\hspace{4cm}\quad x=\pm \dfrac {a^2}c$

and focus $\hspace{5cm}\qquad F(\pm c,0)$

where $\hspace{6cm}\quad c=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}$.

Consider wlog only the right branch of the the hyperbola.

Let a general point on the hyperbola be $\qquad P(a \sec u, b\tan u)$.

Differentiating wrt u and diving gives $\qquad \dfrac {dy}{dx}=\dfrac b{a\sin u}$.

Tangent at $P$: $\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\;\; y=\dfrac b{\sin u}\bigg(\dfrac xa-\cos u\bigg)$

Intecept, $Q$, at directrix: $\qquad\qquad\qquad\bigg(\dfrac {a^2}c, \dfrac b{\sin u}\bigg(\dfrac ac-\cos u\bigg)\bigg)$

Slope of $PF$, $m_1$:$\hspace{5cm}\dfrac {b\sin u}{a-c\cos u}$

Slope of $QF$, $m_2$:$\hspace{5cm}\dfrac {\frac{b}{\sin u}(\frac ac-\cos u)}{\frac {a^2}c-c}=\dfrac {c\cos u-a}{b\sin u}$

As $$m_1\cdot m_2=-1$$ hence $PF\perp QF$, i.e. $\angle PFQ$ is a right angle. $\blacksquare$

See desmos implementation here.