0
$\begingroup$

My text book derives a parametric formula for the surface area element $dS$ (which I follow and can understand). However it then goes on to remark that the surface area element can also be obtained geometrically as $$dS=\bigg|\frac{1}{\cos\theta}\bigg|dxdy=\frac{|\textbf{n}|}{|\textbf{n} \bullet\textbf{k}|}dxdy$$ where $\cos\theta$ is the angle between the normal vector n to the surface, and the unit vector k in the direction of the positive z-axis.

I am confuse with the $\bigg|\frac{1}{\cos\theta}\bigg|$ part? I thought that $\cos\theta$ might come from $\textbf{n} \bullet\textbf{k}=|\textbf{n}||\textbf{k}|\cos\theta$, where $|\textbf{n}|=|\textbf{k}|=1$ but I think this assumption is wrong as $\textbf{n}$ is not a unit vector nor does it explain why the fraction $\frac{1}{\cos\theta}$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That formula holds for the dot product whether or not they are unit vectors. $\endgroup$ – Paul Jul 13 '17 at 11:17
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry I still don't follow. Appreciate it if you could possibly expand your explanation. $\endgroup$ – Eiraus Jul 13 '17 at 11:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You have $|\mathbf n|$ in the numerator on the right-hand side, which takes care of $\mathbf n$ not necessarily being a unit vector. Substitute your expansion of $\mathbf n\cdot\mathbf k$ into this expression and simplify. $\endgroup$ – amd Jul 13 '17 at 20:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.