I posted a question some time ago which was poorly received. Admittedly, my lecture notes were pretty sloppy too so that could have played a part in my inability to frame the question I wanted.

from lecture notes which obviously is sloppy...

Automorphism of a group is a group action

Here is the definition for group action:

Let G be a group, $\Omega$ be a finite set. A function $\mu: \Omega \times G\rightarrow \Omega$

is called an action of G on $\omega$ if two properties are satisfied:

1)$\mu \left ( \omega,e\ \right )=\omega$

2) $\mu\left ( \omega,gh \right )=\omega^{gh}=\mu\left ( \mu\left ( \omega,g \right ),h \right )$

Diving into the problem:

Given the definition for the action of a group G on a set, the fact that Aut(G) acts on $\Omega=G$ comes across as Aut(G) being the group action.

In the linked given, a poster has propositioned a map but going by the general definition of the map given by me above,

it would seem that the map is

$\mu:Aut\left ( G \right ) \times \Omega \rightarrow G$

$\left ( \phi,g \right ) \mapsto g $

so we ought to check for

$\mu\left ( \phi_{1}\phi_{2},g \right ) =g^{\phi_{1}\phi_{2}}$


$\mu\left ( \phi_{e},g \right )$ ,compatibility and identity, respectively.

Am I right?

Any help to lay my doubts to rest is greatly appreciated.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps part of the confusion is that you've got a $G$ in your definition of a group action and a $G$ in your specific example, but they're playing different roles -- $Aut(G)$ is the '$G$' in the group action you're considering, while $G$ is the '$\Omega$'. Why not rewrite the definition of a group action using, say, $H$ and $\Omega$, and use that to investigate the $Aut(G)$, $G$ example? $\endgroup$ – aPaulT Jul 12 '17 at 10:10

Define the mapping $f: (Aut(G), \circ) \times G \to G: (\varphi,g) \mapsto\varphi(g) = \varphi.g$

Clearly this mapping is well defined, since $Aut(G)$ is a function $G \to G$

If $f$ defines an action, then we must have that:

1) $\forall \varphi,\phi \in Aut(G), \forall g \in G: \varphi.(\phi.g) = (\varphi \circ \phi).g$

2) $\forall g \in G: 1_G.g = g$

So let's prove these two properties: Take $\varphi,\phi \in Aut(G)$, $g \in G$

1) $(\varphi \circ \phi).g = \varphi \circ \phi(g) = \varphi(\phi(g)) = \varphi.\phi(g) = \varphi.(\phi.g)$

2) $1_G.g = 1_G(g) = g$

Hence, $f$ defines a group action from $Aut(G)$ on $G$

  • $\begingroup$ Using $\phi$ and $\varphi$ to denote two different morphisms makes things really hard to read. $\endgroup$ – Nephry Jul 12 '17 at 13:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.