Let $\pi:E \rightarrow M$ be a vector bundle and let $s$ $\in$ $\Gamma(E)$ (a section of the bundle). If we have a linear Ehresmann connection on the bundle, we can define a linear connection as $$\nabla s:= \rho_V \circ ds,$$ where $\rho_V$ is projection into $Ker(d\pi)$ (the vertical bundle). But I don't understand why it woks, because of $d\pi(ds(X))=X$, so $Im(ds)$ would be a subset of the horizontal bundle and then $\rho_V \circ ds=0$.

What's going on here?

Another question: With that definition of $\nabla$, how can I get the Leibniz rule $\nabla(fs)=f\nabla(s)+df\otimes s$?. I mean, I understand why $\nabla$ is a map of $\Gamma(E)$ into $\Gamma(Hom(TM,E))=\Gamma(T^{\ast}M\otimes E)$ but I cannot see why $$\rho_V\circ d(fs)=f(\rho_V \circ ds)+(df)s.$$


It is not true in general that the image of $ds$ is contained in the horizontal space. Let us consider a simple example. Let $E=\mathbb{R}^2$, $M=\mathbb{R}$, and $\pi$ be the projection on the first coordinate. In other words, $E$ is the trivial line bundle over the real line. Let $\nabla$ be the trivial connection, that is, the horizontal space at any point $(x,y)\in E$ is spanned by $\partial/\partial x$. In this setting, any section is given by$$x\mapsto(x,f(x)),$$and a section is horizontal (the image of its differential is contained in the horizontal space at any point) if and only if the function $f$ is constant.

Edit: A few words about the Leibniz rule. There are numerous ways to think about connections and the Leibniz rule, and I guess they are all the same in a way. Here is one of those ways.

Let $p\in M$ and $w\in T_pM$. We want to show that for a section $s$ and a function $f$ we have $$\nabla_wfs=df(w)s+f\nabla_ws.$$We proceed by the following steps.

1) Let $e_1,\ldots,e_k$ be a local trivialization of $E$ around $p$, and suppose first that $\nabla$ is the corresponding trivial covariant derivative. In this case, the Leibniz rule is just the usual one for paths in Euclidean space.

Note that step 1) is not enough, as most of the connections do not look locally like a trivial connection.

2)Let $\rho,\rho'$ be two different projections on the vertical bundle, each one of which respects the linear structure of $E$, and let $\nabla,\nabla'$ denote the corresponding covariant derivatives, respectively. We claim that the difference $\nabla-\nabla'=:T$ is a tensor. That is, the map$$(X,s)\mapsto T(X,s)=\nabla_Xs-\nabla_X's$$ is $C^\infty(M)$-linear in both parameters. To see this, let $\widetilde{X}$ and $\widetilde{X}'$ be horizontal lifts of $X$ with respect to both connections. Then $$T(X,s)=\nabla_Xs-\nabla_X's=\left(ds(X)-\widetilde{X}\right)-\left(ds(X)-\widetilde{X}'\right)=\widetilde{X}-\widetilde{X}'.$$ In other words, $T(X,s)$ does not depend on the derivative of $s$ but only on the value of $s$ at a point, and the claim follows.

3) Finally, we claim that if $\nabla$ and $\nabla'$ are two covarivant derivatives, such that $\nabla-\nabla'$ is a tensor and $\nabla'$ satisfies the Leibniz rule, then so does $\nabla$. This is a nice exercise for anyone who is new to connections.

The full Leibniz rule follows from the above three steps.

  • $\begingroup$ ohh you right, thanks. I'm sorry, I didn't write my other questions before (about the Leibniz rule). Please, if you have any idea or a reference, I will appreciate it and it will be really helpful $\endgroup$ – GaSa Jul 7 '17 at 16:58
  • $\begingroup$ @GaSa I added something about Leibniz. $\endgroup$ – Amitai Yuval Jul 8 '17 at 1:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.