3
$\begingroup$

This question follows from another question I've asked on triangles Length of sides of a triangle and area

Let $P_1$ and $P_2$ be two convex quadrilaterals such that $P_1\neq P_2$ and $Area(P_1)\ge Area(P_2)$. Is it true that it is not possible that all sides and diagonals of $P_1$ are shorter than the corresponding sides and diagonals of $P_2$?

This sentence seems true to me, I'll explain my reasoning. Suppose that all four sides and one diagonal of $P_1$ are shorter than the corresponding sides and diagonal of $P_2$. Then, as it is explained in the answer to my older question, the two triangles which triangulate $P_2$ should be "flatter" (otherwise it's not possible $Area(P_1)\ge Area(P_2)$). From this it should follow that the other diagonal of $P_1$ is longer than the corresponding diagonal of $P_2$.

Do you think it's correct? Can you help me formalizing it?

Edit: following user Raffaele's hint I checked out the formulas in this wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrilateral#cite_note-10, but none of them seems useful to solve this problem

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

It is possible that $Area(P_1)\ge Area(P_2)$ while each side and each diagonal of $P_1$ is strictly smaller than the corresponding one in $P_2$.

Take for example $P_1$ to be a square of side $1\,$. Take $P_2$ to be an isosceles trapezoid with the small base and the non-parallel sides all equal to $2$. Flatten the trapezoid while keeping those three sides at the same length $2$. In the limit the large base tends to $3\cdot 2=6$, the diagonals tend to $2 \cdot 2 = 4\,$, and the area tends to $0\,$, yet all the sides and diagonals of $P_2$ are strictly larger than those of $P_1$. Even stronger, any side or diagonal of $P_2$ is strictly larger than any other side or diagonal of $P_1$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.