Let $(M^{n+1},g)$ be a manifold with a Riemannian metric $g$ and let $\nabla$ be its Riemannian connection. We say an immersion $x : N^n \to M^{n+1}$ is (totally) umbilic if for all $p \in N$, the second fundamental form $B$ of $x$ at $p$ satisfies $$\langle B(X,Y),\eta \rangle(p)=\lambda(p)\langle X,Y \rangle,$$ for all $X,Y \in \mathcal X(N)$ and $\lambda(p) \in \mathbb R$ and for a given unit field $\eta$ normal to $x(N)$; here we are using $\langle \, , \, \rangle$ to dontate the metric $g$ on $M$ and the metric induced by $x$ on $N$.

e) Calculate the mean curvature and the sectional curvature of the umbilic hypersurfaces of the hyperbolic space.

(For the other parts (a)-(d), please see this link: Problem 8.6 of do Carmo, Riemannian Geometry. Nonetheless, my question is only on part (e), specifically on calculating the mean curvature.)

The author gave the following hint:

Hint: Consider the model of $H^n$ as the upper half-space. Let $S \cap H^n$ be the intersection of $H^n$ with a Euclidean $(n-1)$-sphere $S \subset \mathbb R^n$ of radius $1$ and center in $H^n$. Since $S \cap H^n$ is umbilic, all of the directions are principal, and it is enough to calculate the curvature of the curves of intersection of $S \cap H^n$ with the $x_1x_n$-plane. Use the expression obtained in part (b) of this exercise to establish that the mean curvature of $S \cap H^n$ (in the metric of $H^n$) is equal to $1$ if $S$ is tangent to $\partial H^n$, is equal to $\cos \alpha$ if $S$ makes an angle $\alpha$ with $\partial H^n$, and is equal to the "height" of the Euclidean center of $S$ relative to $\partial H^n$, if $S \subset H^n$. To calculate the secitonal curvature, use the Gauss formula.

The expression from part (b) I believe the author is referring to is $$ \left\langle \overline \nabla_X \left(\frac{\eta}{\sqrt{\mu}} \right),Y \right\rangle_{\overline g} = \frac{-2\lambda \mu+\eta(\mu)}{2\mu\sqrt{\mu}}\langle X,Y \rangle_{\overline g}. $$ I am not sure on how to apply this formula to establishing the mean curvature, depending on how $S$ is related to $\partial H^n$ ($S$ is tangent to $\partial H^n$, $S$ makes an angle $\alpha$ with $\partial H^n$, etc.).

Do Carmo defined earlier (page 129 to be exact) in the textbook the mean curvature to be $\frac 1n(\lambda_1+\cdots+\lambda_n)$, where $\lambda_i=k_i$ are principal curvatures of $f$.

I am sorry for being unable to show much of what I tried on this question. Nonetheless, any hint or first step will be helpful. Thanks!


I think it goes like this: You can write $B = \lambda g$ in coordinates, use Codazzi equation and the fact that covariant derivative of the metric vanishes ($\nabla g = 0$): For $i,j\neq k$: $$\nabla_{k} B_{ii} = \nabla_{i} B_{ki},$$ $$(\nabla_{k} \lambda) g_{ii} =(\nabla_{i} \lambda) g_{ki},$$ $$(\nabla_{k} \lambda) g_{ii}g^{ij} =(\nabla_{i} \lambda) g_{ki}g^{ij},$$

$$(\nabla_{k} \lambda) \delta_{i}^{j} =(\nabla_{i} \lambda) \delta_{k}^{j},$$ $$(\nabla_{k} \lambda)=0,$$

Then $\lambda$ is constant, the principal curvatures are equal, then mean curvature is either $0$ or $\lambda\neq0$.

On orthonormal coordinates we have Gauss equation as $$-1=\hat{R}_{ijji} = R_{ijji} + B_{ij}B_{ij} - B_{ii}B_{jj}=R_{ijji} -\lambda^2$$ from where the sectional curvature follows.

In order to follow the hint you have to use the metric on the upper half plane $$ds^2 = \frac{\sum_i (dx^i)^2}{x_{n}^2},$$ then use this hyperbolic distance as in the suggestion: $$\text{d}_h (x(p) , x_0)^2 = \frac{1}{\lambda^2},$$ where the distance is something like $$ \text{d}_h (x,y) = 2\,\text{arcsinh} \left(\frac{|x-y|}{2\sqrt{x_ny_n}}\right).$$

Add: Just to be clearer in the last part, consider the unit circle with centre on the vertical axis $(0,y)$, $(y>0)$, in the upper half plane with the metric given above. Then we can write $$x(p) = (\cos\theta, y+ \sin\theta),$$ $$\partial_x = (-\sin\theta, \cos\theta),$$ $$D_{\partial_x}\partial_x = (-\cos\theta, -\sin\theta),$$ $$\hat{n} = \sqrt{y+\sin\theta}(-\cos\theta, -\sin\theta)$$

and before doing the hyperbolic product $\langle D_{\partial_x}\partial_x,\hat{n} \rangle$ look at values of $y$ for which $\hat{n}$ degenerates.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.