9
$\begingroup$

Let $(M,g)$ be a Riemannian manifold and assume that for all orthonormal $v,z$ the sectional curvatures is bounded from below i.e. $K(v,z) \geq C$, where $C > 0$. Is it in this case possible for the Ricci curvature to vanish? Or is this condition, on the sectional curvature, very strong? Sorry if the question is too trivial :).

Gunam

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Wikipedia says that you also get a lower bound on the Ricci curvature. $\endgroup$ – Sam Nov 10 '12 at 17:00
  • $\begingroup$ how exactly? do you know? $\endgroup$ – Gunam Nov 10 '12 at 17:12
8
$\begingroup$

You basically just have to look at the definitions: Given a unit-length tangent vector $x\in T_pM$, we obtain the Ricci curvature of $x$ at $p$ by extending $x=z_n$ to an orthonormal basis $z_1, \ldots, z_n$. And then $$\mathrm{Ric}_p(x) = \frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \langle R(x,z_i)x,z_i\rangle$$ where $R$ denotes the Riemannian curvature tensor. On the other hand, the sectional curvature $K(x, z_i)$ for $i<n$ is given by (remember the $z_i$ are orthonormal) $$K(x, z_i) = \frac{\langle R(x,z_i)x,z_i\rangle}{\Vert x\Vert\, \Vert z_i\Vert-|\langle x, z_i\rangle|^2}=\langle R(x,z_i)x,z_i\rangle$$ Since $K(x,z_i) \ge C$ by your assumption, we obtain $$\mathrm{Ric}_p(x) = \frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \langle R(x,z_i)x,z_i\rangle \ge C > 0$$ So you get a lower bound on the Ricci curvature.

Attention: All sign conventions are as can be found in DoCarmo's "Riemannian Geometry".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.