3
$\begingroup$

I will denote by $d$-vol the $d$ dimensional volume in $\mathbb{R}^D$, where $D \geq d$. For example, if $A=\{(x,y,0)\in\mathbb{R}^3:\text{max}(|x|,|y|)\leq 1\}$, then $3\mbox{-}\text{vol}(A)=0$ but $2\mbox{-}\text{vol}(A)=4$. I know that if $f:\mathbb{R}^D \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^D$ is a differentiable and invertible function, the change of $D$-volume induced by $f$ is $|\text{det}(J)|$, where $J$ is the Jacobian of $f$. Thus, for $f$ to be a $D$-volume preserving transformation we need to ensure that $|\text{det}(J)|=1$. However, if $f$ is $D$-volume preserving it need not be $d$-volume preserving for $d<D$. I was wondering what the equivalent condition is for $f:\mathbb{R}^D \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^D$ to be $d$-volume preserving. Thank you very much!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $1$-volume is length, so I guess you're talking about an isometry? $\endgroup$ – Matthew Leingang Jun 29 '17 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ Well, I'm thinking of a general setting with $d$ fixed. In the particular case where $d=1$, I don't mean the same as an isometry. If $A$ is a 1-dimensional set in $\mathbb{R}^D$, I would like $1\mbox{-}\text{vol}(A)=1\mbox{-}\text{vol}(f(A))$, so for example a segment might be deformed in such a way that the points in it are not at the same distances anymore but the length of the segment remains constant. $\endgroup$ – Vokram8 Jun 29 '17 at 17:34
  • $\begingroup$ @Vokram8: If you map a segment to itself in a way that the points in it are not at the same distances anymore but the length of the segment remains constant, then the length of some subsegment is not preserved. $\endgroup$ – Andrew D. Hwang Jun 29 '17 at 19:28
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for pointing that out Andrew, you are right! Then yes, for the $d=1$ case I am just talking about isometries. $\endgroup$ – Vokram8 Jun 29 '17 at 22:17
2
$\begingroup$

By "zooming in" or "subdividing" (cf. Andrew's comment), this implies (and with a bit more effort is equivalent to) the Jacobian $J_x$ preserving $d$-volume at each point $x \in \mathbb R^D$.

Fixing an $x$, we can use the singular value decomposition to choose oriented orthonormal bases $e_i$ for the domain and $v_i$ for the target so that the matrix representation of $J_x$ is diagonal:

$$ M = [J_x]_{e \to v} = \left(\begin{matrix}\sigma_1 & & \\ &\ddots & \\ &&\sigma_D\end{matrix}\right).$$

Now, the action of $M$ on the unit $d$-cube aligned with the axes numbered $i_1,\ldots,i_d$ is simply to stretch each axis by the corresponding $\sigma$ factor (and maybe do some reflections); so it distorts the volume by the product $|\sigma_{i_1}\ldots\sigma_{i_d}|$. Thus your condition implies that the product of any $d$ of the $D$ numbers $|\sigma_i|$ must be equal to $1$. When $d=D$ this is just the single equation $$|\sigma_1\ldots\sigma_D| = |\det M| = |\det J_x| = 1,$$ as expected.

When $1 \le d < D$, however, there are many more equations; so many, in fact, that (Exercise!) we can conclude $|\sigma_i|=1$ for each $i$. So $M$ is just a composition of reflections, which means $J_x$ is just a composition of reflections and rotations; i.e. a linear isometry. Since this holds for each $x$, we conclude that $f$ is an isometry.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.