0
$\begingroup$

Let w be a 3-form on a 4-manifold, and U be the set where w is nonzero. w is closed iff for all p in U there exists a neighborhood of p where w has coordinate representation 1 dx dy dz.

To show the reverse direction I just took d and got dw=0 so it's closed. I can't figure out the forward direction. I've tried to do it by linearity but that results in a system of equations I don't know how to solve. Any ideas?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This can't be true. The form $dx\wedge dy\wedge dz$ always returns 0 when one of the vectors plugged in is in the fourth direction. So, for example, the form $dx\wedge dy\wedge dz+dx\wedge dy\wedge dw$ can't be represented in this way. $\endgroup$ – Amitai Yuval Jun 26 '17 at 20:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @AmitaiYuval: Sure it can. It's equal to $dx\wedge dy \wedge d(z+w)$, so you just need to define new coordinates by $\big(\tilde x,\tilde y,\tilde z,\tilde w\big) = (x,y,z+w,z-w)$. $\endgroup$ – Jack Lee Jun 26 '17 at 20:33
  • $\begingroup$ @JackLee Thanks, I clearly made a mistake. But was it just a bad example, or is my previous comment completely wrong? I mean, is it true that for every 3-form $\omega$ on a 4-dimensional space $V$, there exists $v\in V$ such that $\omega(v,u,w)=0$ for every $u,w\in V$? $\endgroup$ – Amitai Yuval Jun 26 '17 at 21:31
  • $\begingroup$ @AmitaiYuval: I haven't taken the time to think it through carefully, but I suspect your basic idea is correct. You'd just need to come up with a different example. $\endgroup$ – Jack Lee Jun 26 '17 at 21:33
1
$\begingroup$
  1. If $dVol$ is a volume form, there exists a vector field $V$ such that $i(V) dVol=\omega$. Indeed if $\omega = a dXdYdZ+bdYdZdT+..$ and $dVol= dXdYdZdT$, take $X= a{\partial f\over \partial T}+b{\partial f\over \partial X}+..$

  2. Then, as $V\not=0$, we can choose a new system of coordinates $(x,y,z,t)$ such that $V= {\partial\over \partial t}$, and in this coordinates system, $dVol=f(x,y,z,t)dxdydzdt$, and $\omega= f(x,y,z,t)dxdydz$.

  3. Then, $d\omega=0$ means that ${\partial f\over \partial t}=0$. Therefore $\omega= f(x,y,z)dxdydz$, is basically a volume form on $\bf R^3$, and the standard "Moser lemma" produces a new system of coordinates where $\omega= dxdydz$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What's the Moser lemma that you're referring to? $\endgroup$ – aaron Jun 27 '17 at 5:04
  • $\begingroup$ Volume forms (eg $f(x,y,z)dxdydz$ can be made standard (eg $dudvdw$ ) by a change of coordinates . It was probably known in the 19th century, but people call this Moser lemma. See math.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/~mabreu/GD/moser.pdf $\endgroup$ – Thomas Jun 27 '17 at 5:08
  • $\begingroup$ And in fact if $\omega= f(x,y,z)dxdydz$ and $Z$ is the primitive $\int f(x,y,z)dz$, then the form $\omega $ is $dx dy dZ$. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Jun 27 '17 at 5:13
  • $\begingroup$ The question doesn't assume that the manifold is compact, connected, or oriented. Which I think, after reading some of that paper, is necessary for mosers lemma, and generally to assume dvol exists. $\endgroup$ – aaron Jun 28 '17 at 19:01
  • $\begingroup$ Fine, did you understand te argument ? $\endgroup$ – Thomas Jun 29 '17 at 4:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.