0
$\begingroup$

The very first exercise in May and Ponto's More Concise Algebraic Topology asks for a demonstration of the following claim: given a commutative diagram $$ \require{AMScd} \begin{CD} Y @<<< X @>i>> Z\\ @VVV @VVV @VVV \\ Y' @<<< X' @>i'>> Z' \end{CD} $$ of spaces in which the vertical maps are cofibrations and $i$ and $i'$ closed inclusions, it is not the case that the induced map $$Y \cup_X Z \longrightarrow Y' \cup_{X'} Z'$$ need also be a cofibration. They claim in fact there is an example in which $i'$ is an equality. What is such an example?

While I'm at it, the second, dual question asks for a demonstration that given $$ \require{AMScd} \begin{CD} Y @>>> X @<<< Z\\ @VVV @VVV @VVV \\ Y' @>>> X' @<<< Z', \end{CD} $$ where the vertical maps are now fibrations, it need not be true the induced map $$Y \times_X Z \longrightarrow Y' \times_{X'} Z'$$ is a fibration. Again, why?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

How about this?

Let $X$ be a nonempty CW complex. Consider the diagram $$ \begin{array}{ccccc} X & \leftarrow & \emptyset & \rightarrow & X \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ X & \leftarrow & X & \rightarrow & X \end{array} $$ where all the arrows $X \to X$ are the identity. The map of pushouts is the fold map $X \sqcup X \to X$, which is not injective, so not a cofibration.

We can more or less dualize this to obtain the second counterexample. Let $Y$ be a path-connected space with more than two points, and consider $$ \begin{array}{ccccc} Y & \rightarrow & Y & \leftarrow & Y \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ Y & \rightarrow & * & \leftarrow & Y. \end{array} $$ Then the map of pullbacks is the diagonal map $Y \to Y \times Y$, which is not a fibration.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.