Suppose I choose $\{e_{i_1}\wedge e_{i_2}\wedge\cdots\wedge e_{i_k}:i_1 < \cdots <i_k \}$ to be my basis for the exterior product space $\bigwedge^k(V)$ where $\{e_1, \cdots, e_n\}$ is the standard basis for the vector space $V$. I would like to prove that this is a basis. Linear independence is easy, but spanning seems like a massive undertaking. Suppose I take any arbitrary vector $v_1 \wedge v_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge v_k$ in my exterior product space, and I wish to express this vector in terms of the basis elements above. It seems like I have a massive chain of sums and products to deal with here. Is there any way to simplify the computations? How would you do this?

  • $\begingroup$ If you already know what the basis is for the $k$-fold tensor product, you can use the image of that basis under the quotient map into the exterior algebra as a spanning set of $\bigwedge^k(V)$. Then it should be pretty easy to see the candidate basis you have above is indeed a basis of the exterior product. $\endgroup$ – yousuf soliman Jun 20 '17 at 18:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The element $v_1 \wedge v_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge v_k$ isn't an arbitrary $k$-vector. An arbitrary $k$-vector would be a sum of $k$-vectors of this form (what you have is called a $k$-blade). $\endgroup$ – Aweygan Jun 20 '17 at 18:31

As a comment above said, not every $v \in \bigwedge^kV$ can be written in the form $v_1 \wedge v_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge v_k$. However, every vector can be written as a linear combination of vectors of this form. It therefore suffices to show that every $v$ of that form (i.e. every $k$-blade) can be expressed as a linear combination of your basis.

With that, suppose that $v_j = \sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_{ij} e_i$. We can then write $$ v_1 \wedge \cdots \wedge v_k = \left(\sum_{i_1=1}^n \alpha_{i_11}e_i\right) \wedge \cdots \wedge \left(\sum_{i_k=1}^n \alpha_{i_kk}e_i\right) $$ By multilinearity, expand this into $$ \sum_{1 \leq i_1,\dots,i_k \leq n} \alpha_{i_11}\cdots\alpha_{i_kk}(e_{i_1} \wedge \cdots \wedge e_{i_k}) $$ Now, using the alternating property of the wedge product, why is this ultimately a linear combination of your basis vectors?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.