given $f:\mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ so that all partial derivatives up to second order exist. I am tempted to call that twice partially (not necessarily continuously) differentiable.

$\textbf{Does this imply for f to be (totally) differentiable}$ or even continuously partially differentiable?

My intuition is, that the latter is actually the same as to ask wether a partially differentiable function is autoatically continuous (which is not true) BUT, however, i am quite confused and would appreciate clarification.

P.S.:I think the problem, which trooubles me is essentially the following:

Since $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}$ is partially differentiable , this means that it is continuous along lines paralel to the cooordinate-axes, but I don't expect them to be continuous as funtions on $\mathbb{R}^n$.


Let $h(\theta)$ be a $\pi/2$-periodic $C^{\infty}$ function which is constantly equal to zero in a neighbourhood of $0$ but such that $h(\pi/4) = 1.$ Define $f(x,y) = h(\theta)$, where $\theta$ is the angular coordinate of $(x,y) \ne (0,0)$, and $f(0,0) = 0$.

Then $f$ is not continuous at $(0,0)$, but the partial derivatives of $f$ of all orders exist everywhere.

  • $\begingroup$ No, $f'_x(0,y)=1/y$ for $y \neq 0$, while $f'_x(0,0)=0$, so $f''_{xy}(0,0)$ doesn't exist. $\endgroup$ – Hans Lundmark Jun 20 '17 at 11:45
  • $\begingroup$ @HansLundmark Thanks. $\endgroup$ – user49640 Jun 20 '17 at 11:45
  • $\begingroup$ @HansLundmark It should be okay now. $\endgroup$ – user49640 Jun 20 '17 at 11:59
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that should work! +1. $\endgroup$ – Hans Lundmark Jun 20 '17 at 12:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.