3
$\begingroup$

The Wiki page for Unitary matrices gives a general expression for the 2x2:

\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ -e^{i\phi}b^* & e^{i\phi}a^* \end{pmatrix} With $|a^2| + |b^2| = 1$.

Is there a similar general construction for the 3x3?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It seems unlikely; 2x2 orthogonal (real) matrices have a similarly nice form, but there's not really any such for the 3x3 because the shape is just substantially more complicated than $\mathcal{S}^1$, and I can't imagine that 'complexifying' them changes that. $\endgroup$ – Steven Stadnicki Jun 19 '17 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ One can simplify this question a bit by focusing only on special unitary matrices where $\det{U}=1$. In that case, the construction for $SU(3)$ is relevant in physics and is discussed in this question on Physics.SE: physics.stackexchange.com/q/237988/55641. $\endgroup$ – Semiclassical Jun 19 '17 at 17:04
  • $\begingroup$ (One thing to note: the top answer on the physics.SE question gives what amounts to an 'Euler angles' parametrization, and that parametrization has problems at its boundaries - in particular, it's not one-to-one (or even consistently n-to-1) without some rather unnatural restrictions on its parameters.) $\endgroup$ – Steven Stadnicki Jun 19 '17 at 18:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.