Kaplansky's vs common definition of normal field extension Kaplanksy's definition of normal field extension goes as follows

Let $K\subseteq E$ be fields. $E$ is normal over $K$ if for any $\alpha\in E\setminus K$ there exists $\psi\in \operatorname{Aut}_K(E)$ such that $\psi(\alpha)\neq \alpha$.

By $\operatorname{Aut}_K(E)$ I mean the set of automorphisms of $E$ as a $K$-algebra. A more common definition of normality is

Let $K\subseteq E$ be fields. $E$ is normal over $K$ if any irreducible $f\in K[X]$ that has some roots in $E$ splits in $E$.

The latter definition is equivalent to


*

*$\operatorname{Hom}_K(E,C) = \operatorname{Aut}_K(E)$, where $C$ is an algebraic closure of $E$. 

*There exists $F\subseteq K[X]$ such that $E=K(R)$, where $R$ is set of all roots in $C$ of polynomials in $F$.


My question is, are Kaplansky normality and common normality equivalent? 
 A: These are not equivalent.  For instance, let $K=\mathbb{F}_p(t)$ and let $E=K(t^{1/p})$.  Then $E$ is common-normal over $K$, but it is not Kaplansky-normal, since there are no automorphisms of $E$ over $K$ besides the identity.  Alternatively, let $K=\mathbb{C}$ and let $E$ be the function field of a curve of genus $>1$ over $\mathbb{C}$.  Then $E$ has only finitely many automorphisms over $\mathbb{C}$, and so $E$ has finite dimension over the fixed field of all the automorphisms.  Since $E$ has infinite dimension over $\mathbb{C}$, the fixed field is larger than $\mathbb{C}$, so $E$ is not Kaplansky-normal.  However, it is common-normal, since $\mathbb{C}$ is algebraically closed so trivially every polynomial over $\mathbb{C}$ splits.
What is true is that Kaplansky-normal implies common-normal, and the converse is true assuming $E$ is separable and algebraic over $K$.  First, assume $E$ is Kaplansky-normal over $K$, let $f$ be any polynomial over $K$ and let $F\subseteq E$ be the subfield generated by $K$ and all the roots of $f$ in $E$.  Every automorphism of $E$ over $K$ maps $F$ to itself, so $F$ is also Kaplansky-normal, and is finite over $K$.  If $G=\operatorname{Aut}(F/K)$, we then have $K=F^G$, which implies $F$ is Galois over $K$ by a theorem of Artin.  Since $f$ was arbitrary, this implies $E$ is common-normal over $K$.
Conversely suppose $E$ is separable, algebraic, and common-normal over $K$.  Then $E$ is Galois over $K$, and Galois theory says the fixed field of the automorphism group of $E$ over $K$ is just $K$.  That means exactly that $E$ is Kaplansky-normal over $K$.
