So it seems like in the literature there are two separate meanings for what a bifurcation is.

One meaning is that a bifurcation is the point at which an equilibrium changes behavior.

The other meaning is that a bifurcation is when an equilibrium point splits into two.

Now here is my confusion. I am trying to study the dimensionless generalized version of Chua Circuit Equations $$\dot{x}=a(y-\phi(x))$$$$\dot{y}=x-y+z$$ $$\dot{z}=-by$$ $$\phi(x) = \frac{1}{16}x^3 - \frac{1}{6}$$

and I'm supposed to study bifurcations in this context using $a$ as bifurcation parameter. Now the equilibria in this case are not dependent on the bifurcation parameter $a$. So in this context the equilibria might change behavior but they will not change position or split as a function of $a$.

So what is a bifurcation exactly? Is it a splitting, moving of equilibria or it is a change in behaviour of equilibrium points? Or both?

Also with regards to bifurcation diagrams, I came across the bifurcation diagram in this paper: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5a3c/fa3a66da70f9b6af8510ec7abdeca443fdbb.pdf

Bifurcation of Chua Equations

This is a bifurcation diagram of Chua Equations using the parameter $a$. I don't understand why the equilibrium points are moving and splitting since they aren't a function of $a$? I don't really understand what is going on in this diagram.

  • $\begingroup$ a bifurcation is like a fork split $\endgroup$ Jun 8, 2017 at 17:58
  • $\begingroup$ The latter is a Feigenbaum diagram for every fractal $\endgroup$
    – Narasimham
    Jun 8, 2017 at 18:20

1 Answer 1


Not just equilibria, but also stable periodic orbits.

The equilibrium (corresponding, I think, to the straight line segment on the left in the picture) doesn't depend on $\alpha$, but its stability does. Once it becomes unstable, I think you're looking at a Poincaré section of the attractor (a closed orbit, at least at first), not an equilibrium. That does depend on $\alpha$. Thus in most of the picture, the Poincaré map has an attracting $2$-cycle, which is pictured. Then that bifurcates, producing an attracting $4$-cycle. After an infinite cascade of period-doubling, you get a region that seems to be mostly chaos, with occasional small windows corresponding to stability of some cycle.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .