6
$\begingroup$

Recall: the Mandelbrot set $M$ is defined to be the set of points $c\in \mathbb{C}$ such that the sequence of complex numbers $\{c, c^2+c, (c^2+c)^2 + c, \ldots \}$ is bounded in magnitude. (Recursively, the sequence is defined by $z_1 = c$ and $z_{k+1} = z_k^2 + c$.)

The Wikipedia page on the Mandelbrot set states that the intersection of $M$ with the real axis is precisely the closed interval $[-2,1/4]$.

What if we instead intersect the boundary $\partial M$ of the Mandelbrot set with the real axis? The figure here seems to suggest this intersection may be a discrete set of points, and that this is related to the logistic map. However I did not find the answer to this on either Wikipedia page, after browsing briefly. To summarize, I am wondering:

  • Can we say exactly what real points are in the boundary $\partial M$?

  • Is the intersection $\mathbb{R}\cap \partial M$ a discrete set of points?

  • If it is not discrete, is it dense in any open interval of $\mathbb{R}$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Where there's an attractive fixpoint, there's a gap (i.e., an interior point of $M$); where there's bifurcarion, there's an isolated point. But inberween there are regions of chaos, literally; I'd guess the boundary is dense there. We can largely view $M$ as obtained from a disk by pinching together rational boundary points - so we might find some number-theoretic properties that guide us to the answer to this question $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Jun 8 '17 at 5:14
  • $\begingroup$ I think there should be an infinite number of "baby Mandelbrots" between any two chaotic boundary points. $\endgroup$ – Sheldon L Jun 8 '17 at 19:03
1
$\begingroup$

The only points in the interior of the Mandelbrot set are those inside the main cardioid, or inside a bulb off the main cardioid, or inside a baby mandelbrot. This assumes the hyperbolicity conjecture that there are no queer/ghost interior components; which is unproven, but it is proven on the real axis. All the other points are on the boundary of the Mset. You can't have a "dense" set of points that are both on the boundary and on the real axis; all such points are discreet points, with a hyperbolic region (baby Mandelbrot) arbitrarily close by. This question is related and gives a lot more detail. M-set interior point probability on the real axis

The hyperbolicity conjecture is implied by the MLC (Mandelbrot locally connected conjecture). https://mathoverflow.net/questions/95701/the-deep-significance-of-the-question-of-the-mandelbrot-sets-local-connectednes The "Density of hyperbolicity is known if one restricts to real c". I think it was first proven at the real axis by Lyubich.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ could you provide more detail or references for some of these terms? I'm not familiar with the hyperbolicity conjecture or queer/ghost components. $\endgroup$ – Harry Richman Jul 28 '17 at 4:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ mathoverflow.net/questions/95701/… The MLC conjecture implies the hyperbolicity conjecture, and "Density of hyperbolicity is known if one restricts to real c". I think it was first proven at the real axis by Lyubich. $\endgroup$ – Sheldon L Jul 30 '17 at 15:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.