$Plane1$ is defined by a point $origin1$ and a unit normal vector $normal1$.

$Plane2$ is defined by a point $origin2$ and a unit normal vector $normal2$.

The direction vector of the line of intersection is $vector = {(normal1 \times normal2) \over ||normal1 \times normal2||}$

Let $P=(x, y, 0)$ be a point on the line of intersection.

$$d1 = -(normal1 \cdot origin1)\\ d2 = -(normal2 \cdot origin2)\\ x = {\det\begin{pmatrix}normal1_Y&d1\\normal2_Y&d2\end{pmatrix} \over vector_Z}\\ y = {\det\begin{pmatrix}d1&normal1_X\\d2&normal2_X\end{pmatrix} \over vector_Z}$$

I wrote the code for the whole thing, however, the resulting $x$ and $y$ are wrong.


$origin1 = (5.068435, 8.175731, 6.636723)\\ normal1 = (0.06843487, -0.02417875, -0.01889595)\\ origin2 = (5.15494, 8.304083, 6.409493)\\ normal2 = (0.003429738, -0.0473366, 0.05807309)\\ x = 0.00213990043475194\\ y = 0.00053338281461705$

Expected result (approximately):

$x = 0.3809\\ y = 0.0949$

  • $\begingroup$ How do you know that the line of intersection itself intersects the $x$-$y$ plane? $\endgroup$ – amd Jun 4 '17 at 19:25
  • $\begingroup$ @amd given that the result of computing $vector$ is $(-0.4091549, -0.7189537, -0.56187)$ its z component is not null, it is then possible to assume that z=0 to solve the system $\endgroup$ – R. 久蔵 Jun 4 '17 at 19:28

It looks like you’re using a form of Cramer’s rule to find the intersection point. Your error lies in normalizing the direction vector of the line for the denominators. If you divide your result by $\|normal_1\times normal_2\|$ you’ll get the correct result, but that’s the same as not normalizing in the first place.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. The normalization step was introduced in case $vector$ was too small. $\endgroup$ – R. 久蔵 Jun 4 '17 at 20:28
  • $\begingroup$ @R.久蔵 Minor update: whether or not the two plane normals are unit vectors is irrelevant, since their cross product can still have non-unit norm. The key is to use their cross product as-is. If you want to manage disparities in numerical ranges, you’ll need to scale the original plane normals to keep everything consistent. $\endgroup$ – amd Jun 4 '17 at 20:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.