Riemann Zeta Function:


"Reverse $2$" Riemann Zeta Function:


"Reverse $3$" Riemann Zeta Function:


"Reverse $10$" Riemann Zeta Function:


In general, a Reverse $x$ Riemann zeta function takes $n=1,2,3\dots$ and multiplies it with its reverse value (reverse digits) in number base $x$, then takes the square root of the product. After that, raise it to the power of $-s$ as you would for zeta(s).

As you can see, if $n$ is a palindrome in number base $x$, then it remains $n$. Otherwise, it becomes the $\sqrt{n\times\overline{n}}$ where $\overline{n}$ is the number $n$, but its digits are reversed when written in number base $x$.

The value of "Reverse Zeta $x$" of $s$ tends to $\zeta{(s)}$ as $x$ grows bigger. Suppose we take the limit $x\to\infty$, then we have a normal zeta function. It's because that makes the number base a base where each number is a single symbol (one digit), meaning all $n$s reverse back to $n$.

  • Does something on this already exist somewhere or is this the first time this is mentioned?

  • How can we check when this will converge for a given $x$?
    I suppose the bound slightly varies based on $x$ and converges to that the real part of $s$ must be $\gt1$ as $x$ tends to $\infty$?

  • Can one find closed forms for some $x$ and some $s$?
    For example, what is the (is there a) closed form of this when $x=2$ and $s=2$ ?

Can we express the "reverse $x$ zeta function" in the terms of the zeta function?

Also, I couldn't find anything on the reciprocal sums of palindromic numbers.

  • 9
    $\begingroup$ Is there any motivation behind studying these? $\endgroup$ – Alex R. Jun 4 '17 at 17:47
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ I think you're missing a term in the second sum. I doubt this has been looked at - mathematicians usually don't like things that depend on a choice of base. But - I admire the creativity $\endgroup$ – Jair Taylor Jun 4 '17 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… Since in every base the number of ways that $n$ can be represented as the product of some other number and its mirror is trivially $O(n)$, I think grouping like denominators together shows that it is defined and analytic on $Re(s) \gt 4$? And if the number of ways is $O(1)$ then that should mean the same for $Re(s) \gt 2$. $\endgroup$ – Dan Brumleve Jun 4 '17 at 18:41

Note: Not a complete answer, but here is some Mathematica code that can evaluate this sum and is good to play around with the behavior of your sum.

P[n_, x_] := If[PalindromeQ[IntegerDigits[n, x]], n, Sqrt[n * FromDigits[Reverse[IntegerDigits[n, x]], x]]]
Table[Plot[Sum[1 / (P[n, b])^s, {n, 1, x}], {x, 1, 50}, PlotLabel -> StringForm["s = `1`, base = `2`", s, b]], {s, 1, 5}, {b, 2, 4, 1}]

It's most likely not optimized, since I'm fairly new to Mathematica, but nonetheless. This will generate a table of plots of $\zeta_b(s)$ from $s = 1 \dots 5$ and $b_{base} = 2 \dots 4$, where $\zeta_b$ denotes the reverse base zeta with base $b$. To change some of the parameters: In the second line {s, 1, 5} is {s, <begin_index>, <end_index>} so you can change that to change the increment of $s$. Same goes with the base denoted as $b$. There's a free online Wolfram Lab you can use to test this if you don't have Mathematica. Below is a table of plots generated by this code, where the $x$-axis serves as the bound of the summation:

table of plots

  • $\begingroup$ Where is this Wolfram Lab? I doubt it's Wolfram Alpha, because I already know it would choke on your code. $\endgroup$ – Robert Soupe Jun 4 '17 at 19:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just type wolfram lab into google. It's the first thing for me. You might have to make a free account first. However, it's definitely there cause that's how I ran it and got these images. $\endgroup$ – Dando18 Jun 4 '17 at 19:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.